Theorizing Energy Poverty: A Conceptual Review

KOĎOUSKOVÁ, Hedvika, Colin KIMBRELL a Tereza STAŠÁKOVÁ. Theorizing Energy Poverty: A Conceptual Review. In ENGAGER café, an online meeting of the COST Action network members (WG1). 2021.

Základní údaje

Originální název

Theorizing Energy Poverty: A Conceptual Review

Název anglicky

Theorizing Energy Poverty: A Conceptual Review

Autoři

KOĎOUSKOVÁ, Hedvika, Colin KIMBRELL a Tereza STAŠÁKOVÁ

Vydání

ENGAGER café, an online meeting of the COST Action network members (WG1), 2021

---

Další údaje

Typ výsledku

Prezentace na konferencích

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Klíčová slova anglicky

Assemblage; energy vulnerability; energy justice; energy transition; lived experience; capabilities

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam

---

Anotace

V originále

The contribution presented results of a systematic literature review of energy poverty approaches. It sought to answer the following research questions: What are the major theoretical approaches towards the issue and how do they frame it? Is it possible to identify any categories or clusters among them? What can we learn from the dialogue among key approaches and are there any overarching themes? In doing so, eight approaches grouped into three clusters were identified: 1) assemblage and vulnerability; 2) justice and transition; and 3) lived experiences, behavior, practices and capabilities. While the contribution depicted the approaches as distinctive, it simultaneously highlighted their interconnectedness and major overarching themes.

Anglicky

The contribution presented results of a systematic literature review of energy poverty approaches. It sought to answer the following research questions: What are the major theoretical approaches towards the issue and how do they frame it? Is it possible to identify any categories or clusters among them? What can we learn from the dialogue among key approaches and are there any overarching themes? In doing so, eight approaches grouped into three clusters were identified: 1) assemblage and vulnerability; 2) justice and transition; and 3) lived experiences, behavior, practices and capabilities. While the contribution depicted the approaches as distinctive, it simultaneously highlighted their interconnectedness and major overarching themes.