Další formáty:
BibTeX
LaTeX
RIS
@article{2217618,
author = {Lipková, Lucie and Kumstát, Michal and Struhár, Ivan},
article_location = {Basel},
article_number = {13},
doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137589},
keywords = {critical work; methods; performance analysis; endurance athletes},
language = {eng},
issn = {1660-4601},
journal = {International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health},
title = {Determination of Critical Power Using Different Possible Approaches among Endurance Athletes: A Review},
url = {https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/13/7589},
volume = {19},
year = {2022}
}
TY - JOUR
ID - 2217618
AU - Lipková, Lucie - Kumstát, Michal - Struhár, Ivan
PY - 2022
TI - Determination of Critical Power Using Different Possible Approaches among Endurance Athletes: A Review
JF - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
VL - 19
IS - 13
SP - 1-17
EP - 1-17
PB - MDPI AG
SN - 16604601
KW - critical work
KW - methods
KW - performance analysis
KW - endurance athletes
UR - https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/13/7589
N2 - Critical power represents an important parameter of aerobic function and is the highest average effort that can be sustained for a period of time without fatigue. Critical power is determined mainly in the laboratory. Many different approaches have been applied in testing methods, and it is a difficult task to determine which testing protocol it the most suitable. This review aims to evaluate all possible tests on bicycle ergometers or bicycles used to estimate critical power and to compare them. A literature search was conducted in four databases (PubMed, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science) published from 2012 to 2022 and followed the PRISMA guidelines to process the review. Twenty-one articles met the eligibility criteria: records with trained or experienced endurance athletes, bicycle ergometer, a description of the testing protocol, and comparison of the tests. We found that the most widely used tests were the 3-min all-out tests set in a linear mode and the traditional protocol time to exhaustion. Some other alternatives could have been used but were not as regular. To summarize, the testing methods offered two main approaches in the laboratory (time to exhaustion test andthe 3-min all-out test with different protocols) and approach in the field, which is not yet completely standardized.
ER -
LIPKOVÁ, Lucie, Michal KUMSTÁT a Ivan STRUHÁR. Determination of Critical Power Using Different Possible Approaches among Endurance Athletes: A Review. \textit{International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health}. Basel: MDPI AG, 2022, roč.~19, č.~13, s.~1-17. ISSN~1660-4601. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137589.
|
