Detailed Information on Publication Record
2022
From coping strategy to hopeful everyday practice: Changing interpretations of food self-provisioning
DANĚK, Petr, Lucie SOVOVÁ, Petr JEHLIČKA, Jan VÁVRA, Miloslav LAPKA et. al.Basic information
Original name
From coping strategy to hopeful everyday practice: Changing interpretations of food self-provisioning
Authors
DANĚK, Petr (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution), Lucie SOVOVÁ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Petr JEHLIČKA (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Jan VÁVRA (203 Czech Republic) and Miloslav LAPKA (203 Czech Republic)
Edition
SOCIOLOGIA RURALIS, NETHERLANDS, WILEY, 2022, 0038-0199
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
50700 5.7 Social and economic geography
Country of publisher
Netherlands
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
References:
Impact factor
Impact factor: 4.100
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14310/22:00129160
Organization unit
Faculty of Science
UT WoS
000831133600012
Keywords in English
alternative food networks; care; Central and Eastern Europe; discourse; epistemology; performativity; sustainable food system
Tags
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 22/9/2022 14:51, Mgr. Marie Šípková, DiS.
Abstract
V originále
While alternative food networks (AFNs) have become the leading conceptualisation of sustainable food systems, vibrant scholarship on food self-provisioning (FSP) in Central and Eastern Europe has remained confined to the geopolitical region it investigates. This article brings these two bodies of thought closer together in two steps. First, we trace four framings of FSP deployed over the last three decades—coping strategy, cultural practice, hobby and source of good food and reading FSP as transformative practice—to demonstrate its progressive affinity with AFNs. Second,we follow the most recent framing in highlighting the material reality of local food production as a feature shared by both FSP andAFNs. Fromthis perspective, FSP can be understood as a more radical variant of AFNs given its more substantial environmental and social impact (FSP is more widespread and socially inclusive and less dependent on market transactions). By uncovering the epistemological underpinnings of these different framings of FSP and exploring their implications for food practices on the ground, this article draws general lessons for scholarship aiming to advance food system transformation.
Links
GA19-10694S, research and development project |
|