J 2022

From coping strategy to hopeful everyday practice: Changing interpretations of food self-provisioning

DANĚK, Petr, Lucie SOVOVÁ, Petr JEHLIČKA, Jan VÁVRA, Miloslav LAPKA et. al.

Basic information

Original name

From coping strategy to hopeful everyday practice: Changing interpretations of food self-provisioning

Authors

DANĚK, Petr (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution), Lucie SOVOVÁ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Petr JEHLIČKA (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Jan VÁVRA (203 Czech Republic) and Miloslav LAPKA (203 Czech Republic)

Edition

SOCIOLOGIA RURALIS, NETHERLANDS, WILEY, 2022, 0038-0199

Other information

Language

English

Type of outcome

Článek v odborném periodiku

Field of Study

50700 5.7 Social and economic geography

Country of publisher

Netherlands

Confidentiality degree

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

References:

Impact factor

Impact factor: 4.100

RIV identification code

RIV/00216224:14310/22:00129160

Organization unit

Faculty of Science

UT WoS

000831133600012

Keywords in English

alternative food networks; care; Central and Eastern Europe; discourse; epistemology; performativity; sustainable food system

Tags

Tags

International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 22/9/2022 14:51, Mgr. Marie Šípková, DiS.

Abstract

V originále

While alternative food networks (AFNs) have become the leading conceptualisation of sustainable food systems, vibrant scholarship on food self-provisioning (FSP) in Central and Eastern Europe has remained confined to the geopolitical region it investigates. This article brings these two bodies of thought closer together in two steps. First, we trace four framings of FSP deployed over the last three decades—coping strategy, cultural practice, hobby and source of good food and reading FSP as transformative practice—to demonstrate its progressive affinity with AFNs. Second,we follow the most recent framing in highlighting the material reality of local food production as a feature shared by both FSP andAFNs. Fromthis perspective, FSP can be understood as a more radical variant of AFNs given its more substantial environmental and social impact (FSP is more widespread and socially inclusive and less dependent on market transactions). By uncovering the epistemological underpinnings of these different framings of FSP and exploring their implications for food practices on the ground, this article draws general lessons for scholarship aiming to advance food system transformation.

Links

GA19-10694S, research and development project
Name: Prostory tiché udržitelnosti: samozásobitelství a sdílení
Investor: Czech Science Foundation