2022
Limited benefit of molecular profiling in patients with low-grade endometrial cancer
VREDE, S, J KASIUS, J BULTEN, J VAN WEELDEN W, D BOLL et. al.Základní údaje
Originální název
Limited benefit of molecular profiling in patients with low-grade endometrial cancer
Autoři
VREDE, S, J KASIUS, J BULTEN, J VAN WEELDEN W, D BOLL, M C VOS, A VAN ALTENA, X MATIAS-GUIU, J ASBERGER, E COLAS, A GIL-MORENO, J HUVILA, Vít WEINBERGER, F AMANT, M SNIJDERS, H KUSTERS-VANDEVELDE, A EIJKELENBOOM, R KRUITWAGEN, C REIJNEN a J M PIJNENBORG
Vydání
ESMO Gynaecological Cancers Congress,Valencia, Spain, 17-18 June 2022, 2022
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Konferenční abstrakt
Obor
30214 Obstetrics and gynaecology
Stát vydavatele
Nizozemské království
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Organizační jednotka
Lékařská fakulta
UT WoS
000814982500022
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam
Změněno: 22. 11. 2022 11:30, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Anotace
V originále
Background Most patients present with low-grade (grade 1-2) early-stage (FIGO I-II) endometrioid EC (EEC), it is questioned whether these patients benefit from molecular profiling. We aim to investigate the prognostic relevance of molecular profiling within low-grade EEC. Methods A retrospective multicenter study within the European Network for Individualized Treatment (ENITEC) network. Patients with early-stage EC were excluded if lymph node status was unknown. Molecular profiling was conducted using single-molecule Molecular Inversion Probes based on Next Generation Sequencing. Subsequently, cases were classified as: polymerase epsilon (POLE) mutant, microsatellite instable (MSI), tumor protein (TP53) mutation and no-specific molecular profile (NSMP). Results Total of 393 EC patients were included, 75% had early-stage EC, and 54% low-grade EEC. Of all patients, 8.1% was classified as POLEmut, 16.8% as MSI, 21.4% as TP53-mutated and 53.7% as NSMP. Median follow-up was 5.3-years. Across all molecular subgroups, patients with low-grade EEC had superior disease-specific survival (DSS) compared to high-grade (grade 3) EC, respectively >89% vs. >43%. Equally, patients with low-grade EEC had improved recurrence-free survival (RFS) compared to high-grade EC within POLEmut, MSI and NSMP. Within TP53-mutated, only grade 1 EEC showed an excellent RFS (92%) when compared to grade 2 (54%) and grade 3 EC (44%). In multivariate analysis that included age, lymphovascular space invasion, grade, FIGO stage and the four molecular subgroups, TP53-mutated, high-grade and advanced-stage (FIGO III-IV) remained independent prognostic factors for reduced DSS and RFS (respectively, hazard ratio (HR) 9.20 (95%-CI 1.23-68.90) p=0.031, HR 5.91 (95%-CI 2.63-13.28) p<0.001, HR 3.02 (95%-CI 1.61-5.62) p<0.001 and respectively, HR 12.27 (95%-CI 1.66-90.78) p=0.014, HR 2.66 (95%-CI 1.54-4.57) p<0.001, HR 2.58 (95%-CI 1.56-4.24) p<0.001). Conclusions Patients with grade 1 EEC have an excellent prognostic outcome across all molecular subgroups. In patients with grade 2 EEC, TP53-mutated seems to be prognostic relevant. Based on current data, routine molecular profiling in patients with low-grade EEC has shown limited contributive value to prognostic outcome.