BOKOVÁ, Terezie. Exploring the Concept of Essential State Functions on the Basis of the CJEU’s Decision on the Temporary Relocation Mechanism. European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration. European Paper, 2022, vol. 7, No 2, p. 773-797. ISSN 2499-8249. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.15166/2499-8249/599.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name Exploring the Concept of Essential State Functions on the Basis of the CJEU’s Decision on the Temporary Relocation Mechanism
Authors BOKOVÁ, Terezie (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution).
Edition European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, European Paper, 2022, 2499-8249.
Other information
Original language English
Type of outcome Article in a journal
Field of Study 50501 Law
Country of publisher Italy
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
WWW Open access časopisu
RIV identification code RIV/00216224:14220/22:00127356
Organization unit Faculty of Law
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.15166/2499-8249/599
Keywords in English essential state functions; national identity; art. 4(2) TEU; temporary relocation mechanism; migration crisis; Court of Justice of the European Union
Tags rivok
Tags International impact, Reviewed
Changed by Changed by: Mgr. Petra Georgala, učo 32967. Changed: 24/2/2023 14:23.
Abstract
ABSTRACT: Art. 4(2) TEU stipulating the EU’s respect to Member States’ national identities seems to be the topic of the day in EU law discussions. However, another part of the provision, obliging the EU to respect the Member States’ essential state functions, has received less attention due to which it lacks clarity and is treated ambiguously. This Article attempts to address that gap. It suggests that while the essential state function clause is textually separate from the national identity clause, the aim and function of the clause, as well as the way in which some constitutional courts treat it, evidences that essential state functions are not strictly separated from national identity. Using the examples of the CJEU’s judgment on the temporary relocation mechanism, the Article argues that some Member States’ concerns vis-à-vis the EU could be based on either essential state functions or national identity. In such a situation, essential state functions might seem attractive because of their perceived more objective appearance than national identity. However, the given example also shows that even essential state functions could cover arguments problematic from the perspective of common EU values (art. 2 TEU).
Links
MUNI/A/1257/2020, interní kód MUName: Národní a ústavní identity států EU
Investor: Masaryk University
PrintDisplayed: 15/6/2024 00:56