Czechia.  Risks and Opportunities Related to Media and
Journalism Studies (2000–2020). Case Study on the National
Research and Monitoring Capabilities. In: Studies on national
media research capability as a contextual domain of the sources
of ROs. Approaching deliberative communication: Studies on
monitoring capability and on critical junctures of media
development in 14 EU countries, CS1, D-2.1

V 2022

Czechia. Risks and Opportunities Related to Media and Journalism Studies (2000–2020). Case Study on the National Research and Monitoring Capabilities. In: Studies on national media research capability as a contextual domain of the sources of ROs. Approaching deliberative communication: Studies on monitoring capability and on critical junctures of media development in 14 EU countries, CS1, D-2.1

WASCHKOVÁ CÍSAŘOVÁ, Lenka, Iveta JANSOVÁ and Jan MOTAL

Basic information

Original name

Czechia. Risks and Opportunities Related to Media and Journalism Studies (2000–2020). Case Study on the National Research and Monitoring Capabilities. In: Studies on national media research capability as a contextual domain of the sources of ROs. Approaching deliberative communication: Studies on monitoring capability and on critical junctures of media development in 14 EU countries, CS1, D-2.1

Authors

WASCHKOVÁ CÍSAŘOVÁ, Lenka (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution), Iveta JANSOVÁ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution) and Jan MOTAL (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution)

Edition

Tartu, 25 pp. Mediadelcom, 2022

Publisher

University of Tartu

Other information

Language

English

Type of outcome

Výzkumná zpráva

Field of Study

50800 5.8 Media and communications

Country of publisher

Estonia

Confidentiality degree

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

References:

URL

RIV identification code

RIV/00216224:14230/22:00127783

Organization unit

Faculty of Social Studies

Keywords in English

country case study 1

Abstract

V originále

The Country Case Study focused on the nation’s potential to monitor the four domains. Given the small size of both the Czech academic field and the media industry, and the expected small number of resources, our team decided to gather the data in an “everything we can find” man-ner. We focused on published academic texts, student theses, and media industry data.In general, the analysed texts are uneven in terms of:1. Saturation of time periods – Until 2010, academic publications were sporadic, and authors were initially foreign academics; later, industry data were gradually systematised and slowly became inaccessible and monetised; 2. Thematic density – Focus on individual topics was more a reflection of authors' and media organisations’ individual interests than a systematic strategy of the field and industry; 3. Thematic breadth – The small size of the academic field and the limited number of associat-ed academics and students did not allow for coverage of even the core disciplinary topics over a longer period; the limited size of the media system has not created a sufficiently competitive environment for data to be accessible or for a relevant professional association to emerge; and 4. Quality – Scholarly texts tended to be theoretical or descriptive, and only in later years did they build on empirical data, plus relevant industry data became inaccessible.This list is a set of risks that concern our monitoring capabilities and the quality of the sources.

Links

101004811, interní kód MU

Name: Critical Exploration of Media Related Risks and Opportunities for Deliberative Communication: Development Scenarios of the European Media Landscape (Acronym: MEDIADELCOM)

Investor: European Union, Europe in a changing world - inclusive, innovative and reflective Societies (Societal Challenges)

Citovat

WASCHKOVÁ CÍSAŘOVÁ, Lenka, Iveta JANSOVÁ and Jan MOTAL. Czechia. Risks and Opportunities Related to Media and Journalism Studies (2000–2020). Case Study on the National Research and Monitoring Capabilities. In: Studies on national media research capability as a contextual domain of the sources of ROs. Approaching deliberative communication: Studies on monitoring capability and on critical junctures of media development in 14 EU countries, CS1, D-2.1. Tartu: University of Tartu, 2022, 25 pp. Mediadelcom.

@misc{2244218,
   author = {Waschková Císařová, Lenka and Jansová, Iveta and Motal, Jan},
   address = {Tartu},
   keywords = {country case study 1},
   language = {eng},
   location = {Tartu},
   publisher = {University of Tartu},
   title = {Czechia. Risks and Opportunities Related to Media and Journalism Studies (2000–2020). Case Study on the National Research and Monitoring Capabilities. In: Studies on national media research capability as a contextual domain of the sources of ROs. Approaching deliberative communication: Studies on monitoring capability and on critical junctures of media development in 14 EU countries, CS1, D-2.1},
   url = {https://www.mediadelcom.eu/publications/d21-case-study-1/cze/},
   year = {2022}
}

TY  - GEN
ID  - 2244218
AU  - Waschková Císařová, Lenka - Jansová, Iveta - Motal, Jan
PY  - 2022
TI  - Czechia. Risks and Opportunities Related to Media and Journalism Studies (2000–2020). Case Study on the National Research and Monitoring Capabilities. In: Studies on national media research capability as a contextual domain of the sources of ROs. Approaching deliberative communication: Studies on monitoring capability and on critical junctures of media development in 14 EU countries, CS1, D-2.1
VL  - Mediadelcom
PB  - University of Tartu
CY  - Tartu
KW  - country case study 1
UR  - https://www.mediadelcom.eu/publications/d21-case-study-1/cze/
N2  - The Country Case Study focused on the nation’s potential to monitor the four domains. Given the small size of both the Czech academic field and the media industry, and the expected small number of resources, our team decided to gather the data in an “everything we can find” man-ner. We focused on published academic texts, student theses, and media industry data.In general, the analysed texts are uneven in terms of:1. Saturation of time periods – Until 2010, academic publications were sporadic, and authors were initially foreign academics; later, industry data were gradually systematised and slowly became inaccessible and monetised; 2. Thematic density – Focus on individual topics was more a reflection of authors' and media organisations’ individual interests than a systematic strategy of the field and industry; 3. Thematic breadth – The small size of the academic field and the limited number of associat-ed academics and students did not allow for coverage of even the core disciplinary topics over a longer period; the limited size of the media system has not created a sufficiently competitive environment for data to be accessible or for a relevant professional association to emerge; and 4. Quality – Scholarly texts tended to be theoretical or descriptive, and only in later years did they build on empirical data, plus relevant industry data became inaccessible.This list is a set of risks that concern our monitoring capabilities and the quality of the sources.
ER  -

WASCHKOVÁ CÍSAŘOVÁ, Lenka, Iveta JANSOVÁ and Jan MOTAL. \textit{Czechia. Risks and Opportunities Related to Media and Journalism Studies (2000–2020). Case Study on the National Research and Monitoring Capabilities. In: Studies on national media research capability as a contextual domain of the sources of ROs. Approaching deliberative communication: Studies on monitoring capability and on critical junctures of media development in 14 EU countries, CS1, D-2.1}. Tartu: University of Tartu, 2022, 25 pp. Mediadelcom.

Detailed Information on Publication Record