2023
On word order and non-conservative percentage quantification in Slavic and German
GEHRKE, Berit and Marcin WĄGIELBasic information
Original name
On word order and non-conservative percentage quantification in Slavic and German
Authors
GEHRKE, Berit (276 Germany) and Marcin WĄGIEL (616 Poland, guarantor, belonging to the institution)
Edition
GLOSSA-A JOURNAL OF GENERAL LINGUISTICS, ENGLAND, UBIQUITY PRESS LTD, 2023, 2397-1835
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Article in a journal
Field of Study
60203 Linguistics
Country of publisher
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Confidentiality degree
is not subject to a state or trade secret
Impact factor
Impact factor: 0.900
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14210/23:00134044
Organization unit
Faculty of Arts
UT WoS
000993919600003
EID Scopus
2-s2.0-85147411310
Keywords in English
conservativity; percentage quantifier; information structure; word order; relative measurement; proportion
Tags
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Changed: 6/2/2024 10:36, Mgr. et Mgr. Lucie Racyn
Abstract
In the original language
This paper discusses conservative and non-conservative construals of percentage quantifiers (%Qs), e.g., 50% of the women vs. 50% women, in Slavic and German. Based on data from corpora and cross-linguistic questionnaires, we make the novel empirical generalization that word order plays a crucial role in distinguishing between these two readings, irrespective of whether there is an additional difference between definite vs. bare nominals (German, Bulgarian, Macedonian) or not (the other Slavic languages). Specifically, non-conservative %Qs appear low in the structure, inside the VP, whereas conservative %Qs either appear in their canonical position, depending on their syntactic role as subject or object (German, Bulgarian), or high/VP-externally (the other Slavic languages). We propose that non-conservative %Qs are always interpreted low and combine with the predicate on a par with semantically incorporated nominals and, with intransitves, existential constructions. We argue against previous accounts that ascribe a crucial role to focus for the non-conservative reading to arise, in taking focus to merely be derivative from the requirement of non-conservative %Qs to appear low, paired with a general rule for sentential stress placement.
Links
GA20-16107S, research and development project |
|