Reply to Chen et al.

J 2022

Reply to Chen et al.

FILA, Petr, Jan GOFUS, Petr NĚMEC a Jan VOJACEK

Základní údaje

Originální název

Reply to Chen et al.

Autoři

FILA, Petr (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí), Jan GOFUS (203 Česká republika), Petr NĚMEC (203 Česká republika, domácí) a Jan VOJACEK (203 Česká republika)

Vydání

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, CARY, OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC, 2022, 1010-7940

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

30201 Cardiac and Cardiovascular systems

Stát vydavatele

Spojené státy

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

URL

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 3.400

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14110/22:00128254

Organizační jednotka

Lékařská fakulta

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezac260

UT WoS

000791440700001

Klíčová slova anglicky

Ross operation; Pulmonary conduit; Reoperation; Reintervention

Štítky

14110911, rivok

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 25. 1. 2023 09:08, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová

Anotace

V originále

We read the letter to the editor written by Chen et al. regarding our published study with great interest. We agree that the reintervention rate on both valves is of utmost importance. Therefore, we described the need for reintervention separately as follows: 9 patients (3.1%) in the Ross group had to undergo a reoperation due to autograft failure and 4 patients (1.4%) underwent a reoperation of the homograft. On the other hand, 16 patients (5.5%) underwent reoperation in the mechanical aortic valve replacement (mAVR) group. We conclude that there is no significant difference in the risk of reoperation between the Ross operation (RO) and mAVR (P = 0.54) in the mid-term postoperatively. However, only a limited number of patients in our study with a follow-up >10 years after the RO. Therefore, our ability to objectively analyse this long-term complication was limited.

Citovat

FILA, Petr, Jan GOFUS, Petr NĚMEC a Jan VOJACEK. Reply to Chen et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY. CARY: OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC, 2022, roč. 62, č. 4, s. "ezac260", 1 s. ISSN 1010-7940. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezac260.

@article{2249564,
   author = {Fila, Petr and Gofus, Jan and Němec, Petr and Vojacek, Jan},
   article_location = {CARY},
   article_number = {4},
   doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezac260},
   keywords = {Ross operation; Pulmonary conduit; Reoperation; Reintervention},
   language = {eng},
   issn = {1010-7940},
   journal = {EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY},
   title = {Reply to Chen et al.},
   url = {https://academic.oup.com/ejcts/article/62/4/ezac260/6572341?login=true},
   volume = {62},
   year = {2022}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 2249564
AU  - Fila, Petr - Gofus, Jan - Němec, Petr - Vojacek, Jan
PY  - 2022
TI  - Reply to Chen et al.
JF  - EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY
VL  - 62
IS  - 4
SP  - "ezac260"
EP  - "ezac260"
PB  - OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
SN  - 10107940
KW  - Ross operation
KW  - Pulmonary conduit
KW  - Reoperation
KW  - Reintervention
UR  - https://academic.oup.com/ejcts/article/62/4/ezac260/6572341?login=true
N2  - We read the letter to the editor written by Chen et al. regarding our published study with great interest. We agree that the reintervention rate on both valves is of utmost importance. Therefore, we described the need for reintervention separately as follows: 9 patients (3.1%) in the Ross group had to undergo a reoperation due to autograft failure and 4 patients (1.4%) underwent a reoperation of the homograft. On the other hand, 16 patients (5.5%) underwent reoperation in the mechanical aortic valve replacement (mAVR) group. We conclude that there is no significant difference in the risk of reoperation between the Ross operation (RO) and mAVR (P = 0.54) in the mid-term postoperatively. However, only a limited number of patients in our study with a follow-up >10 years after the RO. Therefore, our ability to objectively analyse this long-term complication was limited.
ER  -

FILA, Petr, Jan GOFUS, Petr NĚMEC a Jan VOJACEK. Reply to Chen et al. \textit{EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY}. CARY: OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC, 2022, roč.~62, č.~4, s.~''ezac260'', 1 s. ISSN~1010-7940. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezac260.

Podrobný výpis o publikaci