Detailed Information on Publication Record
2024
Contrasting two improved and two unimproved cases of patients with medically unexplained physical symptoms after multicomponent treatment
POLAKOVSKÁ, Lucia, Jan ROUBAL, Michal ČEVELÍČEK and Tomáš ŘIHÁČEKBasic information
Original name
Contrasting two improved and two unimproved cases of patients with medically unexplained physical symptoms after multicomponent treatment
Authors
POLAKOVSKÁ, Lucia (703 Slovakia, belonging to the institution), Jan ROUBAL (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Michal ČEVELÍČEK (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution) and Tomáš ŘIHÁČEK (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution)
Edition
Counselling Psychology Quarterly, Abingdon, Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis, 2024, 0951-5070
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
50100 5.1 Psychology and cognitive sciences
Country of publisher
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
References:
Impact factor
Impact factor: 3.000 in 2022
Organization unit
Faculty of Social Studies
UT WoS
999
Keywords in English
Medically unexplained physical symptoms; multicomponent treatment; patients’ experience; chronic illness; psychosomatics
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 18/1/2024 10:25, prof. Mgr. Tomáš Řiháček, Ph.D.
Abstract
V originále
Objective: While some patients suffering from medically unexplained physical symptoms (MUPS) benefit from psychological treatment, others do not. The aim of this study was to analyse both quantitative and qualitative data of four patients with MUPS (two improvers and two nonimprovers) after multicomponent treatment to find an explanation for the outcome differences. Method: Two improvers and two nonimprovers were contrasted within the explanatory sequential mixed method design. Quantitative prepost data from multiple outcome measures were combined with semistructured interviews. Findings: The analysis revealed two key processes that differentiated improvers from nonimprovers: (1) implementing lifestyle changes and (2) receiving environmental support. Furthermore, interoceptive awareness and emotional regulation may be two other important processes seen in quantitative data but not identified by patients. Conclusion: The findings of this study offer an understanding of the different impacts of selected change mechanisms in patients with MUPS, which may help clinicians deliberately aim to focus on important areas of treatment.
Links
GA18-08512S, research and development project |
| ||
MUNI/A/1216/2020, interní kód MU |
|