J 2022

Evaluation of non-healing wounds

HOLUBOVA, Adela a Andrea POKORNÁ

Základní údaje

Originální název

Evaluation of non-healing wounds

Autoři

HOLUBOVA, Adela (203 Česká republika, garant) a Andrea POKORNÁ (203 Česká republika, domácí)

Vydání

Kontakt : Journal of Nursing and Social Sciences related to Health and Illness, České Budějovice, Jihočeská univerzita v Českých Budějovicích, Zdravotně sociální fakulta, 2022, 1212-4117

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

30307 Nursing

Stát vydavatele

Česká republika

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 0.300

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14110/22:00128281

Organizační jednotka

Lékařská fakulta

UT WoS

000849269000009

Klíčová slova anglicky

Accurate scale; Clinical algorithm; Evaluation; Non-healing wound; Wound healing consultant

Štítky

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 25. 1. 2023 14:42, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová

Anotace

V originále

Introduction: The treatment of patients with non-healing wounds requires a systematic approach, including a complete wound assessment and an accurate description of this assessment. Methods: A cross-sectional retrospective study - content analysis of documentation from various localities of the Czech Republic. Using the cluster analysis method to find out if there are groups that differ in their approach to evaluating the parameters of non-healing wounds. 331 dossiers from 16 inpatient and outpatient care providers and social service providers were analysed. Goals: The goal was to assess how non-healing wounds are evaluated and documented in clinical practice at selected health care and social care providers in the Czech Republic. To verify whether a clinical algorithm for evaluating non-healing wounds is available in clinical practice for selected providers and whether it is used. Results: The resulting data can be divided into three separate clusters. Individual groups can be characterised as cluster 1 - "mixed documentation", which contains 280 content analyses; cluster 2 - "nursing documentation of wound healing consultants", which includes 45 content analyses; cluster 3 - "nursing documentation - pre-printed form", which contains six content analyses. Cluster 2 shows more frequent use of objectification in the evaluation of wound parameters. Conclusions: The research showed that evaluating the parameters of non-healing wounds is very inconsistent. The recommended procedure for assessing the condition of non-healing wounds is not adequately followed and accepted in clinical practice. We have verified that the presence of a wound healing consultant is related to the more frequent use of accurate scales to assess wounds.