SINGH, Nishita, Nima KASHANI, Manon KAPPELHOF, Petra CIMFLOVÁ, Johanna OSPEL, Rosalie MCDONOUGH, Bijoy MENON, Michael CHEN, Jens FIEHLER, Noboyuki SAKAI a Mayank GOYAL. Willingness to randomize primary medium vessel occlusions for endovascular treatment. JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY. ISSY: MASSON EDITEUR, 2022, roč. 49, č. 2, s. 157-163. ISSN 0150-9861. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neurad.2021.08.001.
Další formáty:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Základní údaje
Originální název Willingness to randomize primary medium vessel occlusions for endovascular treatment
Autoři SINGH, Nishita, Nima KASHANI, Manon KAPPELHOF, Petra CIMFLOVÁ (203 Česká republika, domácí), Johanna OSPEL, Rosalie MCDONOUGH, Bijoy MENON, Michael CHEN, Jens FIEHLER, Noboyuki SAKAI a Mayank GOYAL (garant).
Vydání JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, ISSY, MASSON EDITEUR, 2022, 0150-9861.
Další údaje
Originální jazyk angličtina
Typ výsledku Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor 30224 Radiology, nuclear medicine and medical imaging
Stát vydavatele Francie
Utajení není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
WWW URL
Impakt faktor Impact factor: 3.500
Kód RIV RIV/00216224:14110/22:00128429
Organizační jednotka Lékařská fakulta
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neurad.2021.08.001
UT WoS 000775411600006
Klíčová slova anglicky Acute ischemic stroke; Medium vessel occlusion; Distal occlusion; Endovascular therapy
Štítky 14110119, rivok
Příznaky Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změnil Změnila: Mgr. Tereza Miškechová, učo 341652. Změněno: 31. 1. 2023 10:29.
Anotace
Background and purpose: Patients with acute ischemic stroke due to medium vessel occlusion (MeVO) make up a substantial part of the acute stroke population, though guidelines currently do not recommend endovascular treatment (EVT) for them. A growing body of evidence suggests that EVT is effective in MeVOs, including observational data but no randomized studies. We aimed to explore willingness of physicians worldwide to randomize MeVO stroke patients into a hypothetical trial comparing EVT in addition to best medical management versus best medical management only. Methods: In an international cross-sectional survey among stroke physicians, participants were presented with 4 cases of primary MeVOs (6 scenarios each). Each subsequent scenario changed one key patient characteristic compared to the previous one, and asked survey participants whether they would be willing to randomize the described patient. Overall, physician- and scenario-specific decision rates were calculated. Multivariable logistic regression with clustering by respondent was performed to assess factors influencing the decision to randomize. Results: Overall, 366 participants (56 women) from 44 countries provided 8784 answers to 24 MeVO case scenarios. The majority of responses (78.3%) were in favor of randomizing. Most physicians were willing to accept patients transferred for EVT from a primary center (82%) and the majority of these (76.5%) were willing to randomize these patients after transfer. Patient age > 65 years, A3 occlusion, small core volume, and patient intravenous alteplase eligibility significantly influenced the physician's decision to randomize (adjOR 1.24, 95%CI 1.13-1.36; adjOR 1.17, 95%CI 1.01-1.34; adjOR 0.98, 95%CI 0.97-0.99 and adjOR 1.38, 95%CI 1.21 -1.57, respectively). Conclusions: Most physicians in this survey were willing to randomize acute MeVO stroke patients irrespective of patient characteristics into a trial comparing EVT in addition to best medical management versus best medical management only, suggesting there is clinical equipoise.
VytisknoutZobrazeno: 26. 7. 2024 03:29