Challenging the insider outsider approach to advocacy : how
collaboration networks and belief similarities shape strategy
choices

J 2023

Challenging the insider outsider approach to advocacy : how collaboration networks and belief similarities shape strategy choices

WAGNER, Paul M., Petr OCELÍK, Antti GRONOW, Tuomas YLÄ-ANTILLA, Florence METZ et. al.

Základní údaje

Originální název

Challenging the insider outsider approach to advocacy : how collaboration networks and belief similarities shape strategy choices

Autoři

WAGNER, Paul M. (840 Spojené státy), Petr OCELÍK (203 Česká republika, domácí), Antti GRONOW (246 Finsko), Tuomas YLÄ-ANTILLA (246 Finsko) a Florence METZ (528 Nizozemské království)

Vydání

Policy & Politics, Bristol, Policy Press, 2023, 0305-5736

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

50601 Political science

Stát vydavatele

Velká Británie a Severní Irsko

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

article - open access

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 4.700 v roce 2022

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14230/23:00130264

Organizační jednotka

Fakulta sociálních studií

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1332/030557322X16681603168232

UT WoS

000935134800003

Klíčová slova anglicky

advocacy strategies; ACF; collaboration; beliefs; climate change policy; network analysis; interest groups

Štítky

rivok

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 8. 3. 2024 10:30, Mgr. Blanka Farkašová

Anotace

V originále

Advocacy strategies are a key success factor for public, private and third sector actors who participate in and seek to influence policy choices. Despite this, research on policy networks has paid little attention to the forms of advocacy studied by interest groups scholars. The interest groups’ literature differentiates insider from outsider strategies and assumes that interest groups with strong access to policymakers opt for insider strategies, while those with weak access are constrained to the use of outsider strategies. This literature has not considered how the full set of actors that constitute a policy network use advocacy strategies. Furthermore, the insider/outsider dichotomy oversimplifies and neglects the possibility that actors’ choices are interdependent. Using climate change policy network data from four countries that vary by interest group system, we investigate if policy actors’ choices of advocacy strategies are similar to those in their collaboration network and to those with similar policy beliefs as their own. Results show that, irrespective of the context, actors are likely to use the same advocacy strategies as their collaboration partners and those whose policy beliefs are like their own. This research demonstrates the value of using a policy network approach to move beyond the insider/outsider dichotomy on interest groups’ use of advocacy strategies. It makes a clear contribution to this scholarship by advancing the debate on strategies that policy actors employ to influence policymaking through evidencing interdependencies between the strategies used by policy actors due to belief similarity and a ‘networking effect’.

Návaznosti

MUNI/A/1196/2022, interní kód MU

Název: Perspektivy evropské integrace v kontextu globální politiky V

Investor: Masarykova univerzita, Perspektivy evropské integrace v kontextu globální politiky V

Přiložené soubory

Challenging_the_insider_outsider_approach_to_advocacy.pdf

Vyhledat podobné dokumenty

Citovat

WAGNER, Paul M., Petr OCELÍK, Antti GRONOW, Tuomas YLÄ-ANTILLA a Florence METZ. Challenging the insider outsider approach to advocacy : how collaboration networks and belief similarities shape strategy choices. Policy & Politics. Bristol: Policy Press, 2023, roč. 51, č. 1, s. 47-70. ISSN 0305-5736. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1332/030557322X16681603168232.

@article{2251541,
   author = {Wagner, Paul M. and Ocelík, Petr and Gronow, Antti and YläandAntilla, Tuomas and Metz, Florence},
   article_location = {Bristol},
   article_number = {1},
   doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1332/030557322X16681603168232},
   keywords = {advocacy strategies; ACF; collaboration; beliefs; climate change policy; network analysis; interest groups},
   language = {eng},
   issn = {0305-5736},
   journal = {Policy & Politics},
   title = {Challenging the insider outsider approach to advocacy : how collaboration networks and belief similarities shape strategy choices},
   url = {https://bristoluniversitypressdigital.com/view/journals/pp/51/1/article-p47.xml},
   volume = {51},
   year = {2023}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 2251541
AU  - Wagner, Paul M. - Ocelík, Petr - Gronow, Antti - Ylä-Antilla, Tuomas - Metz, Florence
PY  - 2023
TI  - Challenging the insider outsider approach to advocacy : how collaboration networks and belief similarities shape strategy choices
JF  - Policy & Politics
VL  - 51
IS  - 1
SP  - 47-70
EP  - 47-70
PB  - Policy Press
SN  - 03055736
KW  - advocacy strategies
KW  - ACF
KW  - collaboration
KW  - beliefs
KW  - climate change policy
KW  - network analysis
KW  - interest groups
UR  - https://bristoluniversitypressdigital.com/view/journals/pp/51/1/article-p47.xml
N2  - Advocacy strategies are a key success factor for public, private and third sector actors who participate in and seek to influence policy choices. Despite this, research on policy networks has paid little attention to the forms of advocacy studied by interest groups scholars. The interest groups’ literature differentiates insider from outsider strategies and assumes that interest groups with strong access to policymakers opt for insider strategies, while those with weak access are constrained to the use of outsider strategies. This literature has not considered how the full set of actors that constitute a policy network use advocacy strategies. Furthermore, the insider/outsider dichotomy oversimplifies and neglects the possibility that actors’ choices are interdependent. Using climate change policy network data from four countries that vary by interest group system, we investigate if policy actors’ choices of advocacy strategies are similar to those in their collaboration network and to those with similar policy beliefs as their own. Results show that, irrespective of the context, actors are likely to use the same advocacy strategies as their collaboration partners and those whose policy beliefs are like their own. This research demonstrates the value of using a policy network approach to move beyond the insider/outsider dichotomy on interest groups’ use of advocacy strategies. It makes a clear contribution to this scholarship by advancing the debate on strategies that policy actors employ to influence policymaking through evidencing interdependencies between the strategies used by policy actors due to belief similarity and a ‘networking effect’.
ER  -

WAGNER, Paul M., Petr OCELÍK, Antti GRONOW, Tuomas YLÄ-ANTILLA a Florence METZ. Challenging the insider outsider approach to advocacy : how collaboration networks and belief similarities shape strategy choices. \textit{Policy \&{} Politics}. Bristol: Policy Press, 2023, roč.~51, č.~1, s.~47-70. ISSN~0305-5736. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1332/030557322X16681603168232.

Podrobný výpis o publikaci