European Standards of Judicial Governance: From Soft Law
Standards to Hard Law

J 2023

European Standards of Judicial Governance: From Soft Law Standards to Hard Law

KOSAŘ, David and Attila VINCZE

Basic information

Original name

European Standards of Judicial Governance: From Soft Law Standards to Hard Law

Authors

KOSAŘ, David (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution) and Attila VINCZE (348 Hungary, belonging to the institution)

Edition

Journal für Rechtspolitik, Wien, Verlag Österreich, 2023, 0943-4011

Other information

Language

English

Type of outcome

Článek v odborném periodiku

Field of Study

50501 Law

Country of publisher

Austria

Confidentiality degree

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

References:

Repozitář MU Web nakladatele

RIV identification code

RIV/00216224:14220/23:00130471

Organization unit

Faculty of Law

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.33196/jrp202204049101

Keywords (in Czech)

demokratický backsliding; ESLP; účinný náprava; základní hodnoty Evropské unie Unie; správa soudnictví; nezávislost soudů; předběžný odkaz; přednost práva EU; zásada zásady zákazu regrese; výběr soudců

Keywords in English

democratic backsliding; ECHR; effective remedy; fundamental values of the European Union; judicial governance; judicial independence; preliminary reference; primacy of EU law; principle of non-regression; selection of judges

Abstract

V originále

This article aims to describe the effect of the ever-expanding case-law of ECtHR and the CJEU on domestic judicial design and its connection to judicial independence. The right to a fair trial and the right to effective remedy, which are fundamental parts of both legal order, has been interpreted in recent times as a yardstick to evaluate the national judicial system, which also leads to an empowerment of the judges and enforcement of soft law standards. These new instruments were established especially to protect judges in illiberal or transitional democracies but they seem to be more and more relevant for established democracies as well.

Links

101002660, interní kód MU

Name: Informal Judicial Institutions: Invisible Determinants of Democratic Decay (Acronym: INFINITY)

Investor: European Union, ERC (Excellent Science)

Files attached

Kosar_Vincze_JRP_4_2022.pdf

Request the author's version of the file

Citovat

KOSAŘ, David and Attila VINCZE. European Standards of Judicial Governance: From Soft Law Standards to Hard Law. Journal für Rechtspolitik. Wien: Verlag Österreich, 2023, vol. 30, No 4, p. 491-501. ISSN 0943-4011. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.33196/jrp202204049101.

@article{2268422,
   author = {Kosař, David and Vincze, Attila},
   article_location = {Wien},
   article_number = {4},
   doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.33196/jrp202204049101},
   keywords = {democratic backsliding; ECHR; effective remedy; fundamental values of the European Union; judicial governance; judicial independence; preliminary reference; primacy of EU law; principle of non-regression; selection of judges},
   language = {eng},
   issn = {0943-4011},
   journal = {Journal für Rechtspolitik},
   title = {European Standards of Judicial Governance: From Soft Law Standards to Hard Law},
   url = {https://is.muni.cz/publication/2268422/},
   volume = {30},
   year = {2023}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 2268422
AU  - Kosař, David - Vincze, Attila
PY  - 2023
TI  - European Standards of Judicial Governance: From Soft Law Standards to Hard Law
JF  - Journal für Rechtspolitik
VL  - 30
IS  - 4
SP  - 491-501
EP  - 491-501
PB  - Verlag Österreich
SN  - 09434011
KW  - democratic backsliding
KW  - ECHR
KW  - effective remedy
KW  - fundamental values of the European Union
KW  - judicial governance
KW  - judicial independence
KW  - preliminary reference
KW  - primacy of EU law
KW  - principle of non-regression
KW  - selection of judges
UR  - https://is.muni.cz/publication/2268422/
N2  - This article aims to describe the effect of the ever-expanding case-law of ECtHR and the CJEU on domestic judicial design and its connection to judicial independence. The right to a fair trial and the right to effective remedy, which are fundamental parts of both legal order, has been interpreted in recent times as a yardstick to evaluate the national judicial system, which also leads to an empowerment of the judges and enforcement of soft law standards. These new instruments were established especially to protect judges in illiberal or transitional democracies but they seem to be more and more relevant for established democracies as well.
ER  -

KOSAŘ, David and Attila VINCZE. European Standards of Judicial Governance: From Soft Law Standards to Hard Law. \textit{Journal für Rechtspolitik}. Wien: Verlag Österreich, 2023, vol.~30, No~4, p.~491-501. ISSN~0943-4011. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.33196/jrp202204049101.

Detailed Information on Publication Record