European Standards of Judicial Governance: From Soft Law
Standards to Hard Law

J 2023

European Standards of Judicial Governance: From Soft Law Standards to Hard Law

KOSAŘ, David a Attila VINCZE

Základní údaje

Originální název

European Standards of Judicial Governance: From Soft Law Standards to Hard Law

Autoři

KOSAŘ, David (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí) a Attila VINCZE (348 Maďarsko, domácí)

Vydání

Journal für Rechtspolitik, Wien, Verlag Österreich, 2023, 0943-4011

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

50501 Law

Stát vydavatele

Rakousko

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

Repozitář MU Web nakladatele

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14220/23:00130471

Organizační jednotka

Právnická fakulta

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.33196/jrp202204049101

Klíčová slova česky

demokratický backsliding; ESLP; účinný náprava; základní hodnoty Evropské unie Unie; správa soudnictví; nezávislost soudů; předběžný odkaz; přednost práva EU; zásada zásady zákazu regrese; výběr soudců

Klíčová slova anglicky

democratic backsliding; ECHR; effective remedy; fundamental values of the European Union; judicial governance; judicial independence; preliminary reference; primacy of EU law; principle of non-regression; selection of judges

Štítky

rivok

Změněno: 9. 2. 2024 09:15, Mgr. Petra Georgala

Anotace

V originále

This article aims to describe the effect of the ever-expanding case-law of ECtHR and the CJEU on domestic judicial design and its connection to judicial independence. The right to a fair trial and the right to effective remedy, which are fundamental parts of both legal order, has been interpreted in recent times as a yardstick to evaluate the national judicial system, which also leads to an empowerment of the judges and enforcement of soft law standards. These new instruments were established especially to protect judges in illiberal or transitional democracies but they seem to be more and more relevant for established democracies as well.

Návaznosti

101002660, interní kód MU

Název: Informal Judicial Institutions: Invisible Determinants of Democratic Decay (Akronym: INFINITY)

Investor: Evropská unie, Informal Judicial Institutions: Invisible Determinants of Democratic Decay, ERC (Excellent Science)

Přiložené soubory

Kosar_Vincze_JRP_4_2022.pdf

Požádat o autorskou verzi souboru

Citovat

KOSAŘ, David a Attila VINCZE. European Standards of Judicial Governance: From Soft Law Standards to Hard Law. Journal für Rechtspolitik. Wien: Verlag Österreich, 2023, roč. 30, č. 4, s. 491-501. ISSN 0943-4011. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.33196/jrp202204049101.

@article{2268422,
   author = {Kosař, David and Vincze, Attila},
   article_location = {Wien},
   article_number = {4},
   doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.33196/jrp202204049101},
   keywords = {democratic backsliding; ECHR; effective remedy; fundamental values of the European Union; judicial governance; judicial independence; preliminary reference; primacy of EU law; principle of non-regression; selection of judges},
   language = {eng},
   issn = {0943-4011},
   journal = {Journal für Rechtspolitik},
   title = {European Standards of Judicial Governance: From Soft Law Standards to Hard Law},
   url = {https://is.muni.cz/publication/2268422/},
   volume = {30},
   year = {2023}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 2268422
AU  - Kosař, David - Vincze, Attila
PY  - 2023
TI  - European Standards of Judicial Governance: From Soft Law Standards to Hard Law
JF  - Journal für Rechtspolitik
VL  - 30
IS  - 4
SP  - 491-501
EP  - 491-501
PB  - Verlag Österreich
SN  - 09434011
KW  - democratic backsliding
KW  - ECHR
KW  - effective remedy
KW  - fundamental values of the European Union
KW  - judicial governance
KW  - judicial independence
KW  - preliminary reference
KW  - primacy of EU law
KW  - principle of non-regression
KW  - selection of judges
UR  - https://is.muni.cz/publication/2268422/
N2  - This article aims to describe the effect of the ever-expanding case-law of ECtHR and the CJEU on domestic judicial design and its connection to judicial independence. The right to a fair trial and the right to effective remedy, which are fundamental parts of both legal order, has been interpreted in recent times as a yardstick to evaluate the national judicial system, which also leads to an empowerment of the judges and enforcement of soft law standards. These new instruments were established especially to protect judges in illiberal or transitional democracies but they seem to be more and more relevant for established democracies as well.
ER  -

KOSAŘ, David a Attila VINCZE. European Standards of Judicial Governance: From Soft Law Standards to Hard Law. \textit{Journal für Rechtspolitik}. Wien: Verlag Österreich, 2023, roč.~30, č.~4, s.~491-501. ISSN~0943-4011. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.33196/jrp202204049101.

Podrobný výpis o publikaci