Limitations of contract cheating research

C 2022

Limitations of contract cheating research

KRÁSNIČAN, Veronika, Tomáš FOLTÝNEK a Dita DLABOLOVÁ

Základní údaje

Originální název

Limitations of contract cheating research

Autoři

KRÁSNIČAN, Veronika (203 Česká republika), Tomáš FOLTÝNEK (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí) a Dita DLABOLOVÁ (203 Česká republika)

Vydání

Cham, Contract Cheating in Higher Education: Global Perspectives on Theory, Practice, and Policy, od s. 29-42, 14 s. 2022

Nakladatel

Springer International Publishing

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Kapitola resp. kapitoly v odborné knize

Obor

50300 5.3 Education

Stát vydavatele

Švýcarsko

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Forma vydání

tištěná verze "print"

Odkazy

URL

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14330/22:00128935

Organizační jednotka

Fakulta informatiky

ISBN

978-3-031-12679-6

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12680-2_3

Klíčová slova anglicky

Academic integrity; Contract cheating; Limitations; Research; Surveys

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 15. 8. 2024 09:43, Mgr. Tomáš Foltýnek, Ph.D.

Anotace

V originále

The contemporary scientific literature on contract cheating offers numerous studies analysing the extent of this form of academic misconduct, including percentages of students engaging in contract cheating based on their field of study, age, gender, and other indicators (e.g., Awdry & Ives, 2020; Bretag, 2019). Given the importance of such studies, researchers startlingly rely on self-reported data obtained via student questionnaires, which is frequently the only method of data collection (Newton, 2018). There are numerous drawbacks to this method, like self-selection bias, confirmation bias, and many others (Mahmud & Bretag, 2013). In this chapter, we summarise the limitations of contemporary contract cheating research, provide recommendations on how to mitigate these limitations, and offer a wider variety of methods that researchers should consider using.

Citovat

KRÁSNIČAN, Veronika, Tomáš FOLTÝNEK a Dita DLABOLOVÁ. Limitations of contract cheating research. In Sarah Elaine Eaton, Guy J. Curtis, Brenda M. Stoesz, Joseph Clare, Kiata Rundle, Josh Seeland. Contract Cheating in Higher Education: Global Perspectives on Theory, Practice, and Policy. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022, s. 29-42. ISBN 978-3-031-12679-6. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12680-2_3.

@inbook{2269841,
   author = {Krásničan, Veronika and Foltýnek, Tomáš and Dlabolová, Dita},
   address = {Cham},
   booktitle = {Contract Cheating in Higher Education: Global Perspectives on Theory, Practice, and Policy},
   doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12680-2_3},
   editor = {Sarah Elaine Eaton, Guy J. Curtis, Brenda M. Stoesz, Joseph Clare, Kiata Rundle, Josh Seeland},
   keywords = {Academic integrity; Contract cheating; Limitations; Research; Surveys},
   howpublished = {tištěná verze "print"},
   language = {eng},
   location = {Cham},
   isbn = {978-3-031-12679-6},
   pages = {29-42},
   publisher = {Springer International Publishing},
   title = {Limitations of contract cheating research},
   url = {https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-12680-2_3},
   year = {2022}
}

TY  - CHAP
ID  - 2269841
AU  - Krásničan, Veronika - Foltýnek, Tomáš - Dlabolová, Dita
PY  - 2022
TI  - Limitations of contract cheating research
VL  - Neuveden
PB  - Springer International Publishing
CY  - Cham
SN  - 9783031126796
KW  - Academic integrity
KW  - Contract cheating
KW  - Limitations
KW  - Research
KW  - Surveys
UR  - https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-12680-2_3
N2  - The contemporary scientific literature on contract cheating offers numerous studies analysing the extent of this form of academic misconduct, including percentages of students engaging in contract cheating based on their field of study, age, gender, and other indicators (e.g., Awdry & Ives, 2020; Bretag, 2019). Given the importance of such studies, researchers startlingly rely on self-reported data obtained via student questionnaires, which is frequently the only method of data collection (Newton, 2018). There are numerous drawbacks to this method, like self-selection bias, confirmation bias, and many others (Mahmud & Bretag, 2013). In this chapter, we summarise the limitations of contemporary contract cheating research, provide recommendations on how to mitigate these limitations, and offer a wider variety of methods that researchers should consider using.
ER  -

KRÁSNIČAN, Veronika, Tomáš FOLTÝNEK a Dita DLABOLOVÁ. Limitations of contract cheating research. In Sarah Elaine Eaton, Guy J. Curtis, Brenda M. Stoesz, Joseph Clare, Kiata Rundle, Josh Seeland. \textit{Contract Cheating in Higher Education: Global Perspectives on Theory, Practice, and Policy}. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022, s.~29-42. ISBN~978-3-031-12679-6. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12680-2\_{}3.

Podrobný výpis o publikaci