2023
Unicuspid Aortic Valve in Patients Undergoing the Ross Procedure
GOFUS, Jan, Petr FILA, Martin VOBORNIK, Jiri ONDRASEK, Petr NĚMEC et. al.Základní údaje
Originální název
Unicuspid Aortic Valve in Patients Undergoing the Ross Procedure
Autoři
GOFUS, Jan (203 Česká republika), Petr FILA (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí), Martin VOBORNIK (203 Česká republika), Jiri ONDRASEK (203 Česká republika), Petr NĚMEC (203 Česká republika, domácí), Jan ŠTĚRBA (203 Česká republika, domácí), Eva CERMAKOVA (203 Česká republika), Martin TUNA (203 Česká republika) a Jan VOJACEK (203 Česká republika)
Vydání
Annals of Thoracic Surgery, New York, Elsevier Science Inc. 2023, 0003-4975
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
30201 Cardiac and Cardiovascular systems
Stát vydavatele
Spojené státy
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 4.600 v roce 2022
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14110/23:00130667
Organizační jednotka
Lékařská fakulta
UT WoS
000944472800001
Klíčová slova anglicky
Unicuspid Aortic Valve; Ross Procedure
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 27. 4. 2023 13:31, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Anotace
V originále
BACKGROUND The prevalence and outcomes of the unicuspid aortic valve (UAV) in patients undergoing the Ross procedure have been strongly underreported in the current literature. We sought to evaluate this in comparison with bicuspid (BAV) and tricuspid valve (TAV) in our Ross cohort.METHODS This was a retrospective observational study of patients undergoing the Ross procedure at 2 dedicated centers between 2009 and 2020. Primary end points were the risks of midterm autograft reoperation and the onset of at least moderate aortic regurgitation during follow-up. The secondary end point was to compare the perioperative out-comes between the groups.RESULTS Included in the analysis were 286 patients, of those 39% with UAV, 52% with BAV, and 9% with TAV. UAV patients were operated on at the youngest age (P < .001) and more often for a combined hemodynamic aortic valve pathology (P = .02). They had the largest aortic root dimensions: annulus (P = .01), Valsalva sinuses (P = .11), sino-tubular junction (P = .001), and ascending aorta (P < .0001). The risks of reoperation (P = .86) and the onset of aortic regurgitation (P = .75) were comparable among the groups over the follow-up of 4.1 years. There was no difference in perioperative outcomes.CONCLUSIONS UAV is a separate unit characterized by a distinct hemodynamic pathology and generated aortopathy. It is not associated with a higher risk of reoperation or new onset of aortic regurgitation after the Ross procedure in the midterm postoperatively. At the current state, UAV remains acceptable for the Ross procedure.