Long-Term Comparison of Endoscopic Versus Open Saphenous Vein
Harvest for Femoral-to-Popliteal Artery Bypass

J 2023

Long-Term Comparison of Endoscopic Versus Open Saphenous Vein Harvest for Femoral-to-Popliteal Artery Bypass

BIROŠ, Ernest, Robert STAFFA, Tomáš NOVOTNÝ, Miroslav KREJČÍ, Lukáš VELECKÝ et. al.

Základní údaje

Originální název

Long-Term Comparison of Endoscopic Versus Open Saphenous Vein Harvest for Femoral-to-Popliteal Artery Bypass

Autoři

BIROŠ, Ernest (703 Slovensko, garant, domácí), Robert STAFFA (203 Česká republika, domácí), Tomáš NOVOTNÝ (203 Česká republika, domácí), Miroslav KREJČÍ (203 Česká republika, domácí), Lukáš VELECKÝ (203 Česká republika, domácí) a Monika SKOTAKOVA (203 Česká republika)

Vydání

INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, NEW DELHI, SPRINGER INDIA, 2023, 0972-2068

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

30212 Surgery

Stát vydavatele

Indie

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

URL

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 0.400 v roce 2022

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14110/23:00130748

Organizační jednotka

Lékařská fakulta

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12262-023-03745-9

UT WoS

000960626000003

Klíčová slova anglicky

Great saphenous vein; Endoscopic vein harvest; Open vein harvest; Femoral-to-popliteal artery bypass; Infrainguinal bypass surgery

Štítky

14110112, 14110121, rivok

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 9. 2. 2024 14:06, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová

Anotace

V originále

Application of endoscopic vein harvest (EVH) in infrainguinal bypass surgery generated mixed results. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes between endoscopic vein harvest and open vein harvest (OVH) in femoral-to-popliteal artery bypass (FPB). Case series analysis that involved all patients undergoing femoral-to-popliteal artery bypass with single-segment great saphenous vein between January 2012 and December 2017. There were 170 femoral-to-popliteal artery bypasses performed in 168 patients who met the inclusion criteria; 25 (14.7%) in EVH group and 145 (85.3%) in OVH group. Chronic limb-threatening ischemia was an indication for surgery in 60% of EVH patients and 79% of OVH patients (15/25; 60% EVH vs 114/145; 79% OVH; p = .08). Mean follow-up was significantly longer for EVH group (65.71 months EVH vs 45.32 months OVH; p = .003). EVH group had a lower wound complication rate (4/25; 16% EVH vs 45/145; 31% OVH; p = .336), especially at the harvest incision site, despite higher rate of obesity amongst EVH patients (15/25; 60% EVH vs 35/145; 24% OVH; p < .001). The reintervention rate was higher in EVH group (10/25; 40% EVH vs 42/145; 29% OVH; p = .38). At 5 years, primary (69.1% EVH vs 67.0% OVH; p = .85), primary assisted (87.6% EVH vs 73.5% OVH; p = .18), and secondary patency rates (87.3% EVH vs 76.7% OVH; p = .25) did not demonstrate significant differences between the groups. Endoscopic vein harvest for femoral-to-popliteal artery bypass decreased the rate and severity of wound complications, but this difference was statistically insignificant. Obese patients are more suitable for endoscopic vein harvest, with relatively lower chances of developing wound infections. Despite the higher rate of reinterventions, endoscopic vein harvest patency rates were in line with those for the open vein harvest group in up to 5 years of follow-up.

Citovat

BIROŠ, Ernest, Robert STAFFA, Tomáš NOVOTNÝ, Miroslav KREJČÍ, Lukáš VELECKÝ a Monika SKOTAKOVA. Long-Term Comparison of Endoscopic Versus Open Saphenous Vein Harvest for Femoral-to-Popliteal Artery Bypass. INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY. NEW DELHI: SPRINGER INDIA, 2023, roč. 85, č. 6, s. 1366-1373. ISSN 0972-2068. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12262-023-03745-9.

@article{2281499,
   author = {Biroš, Ernest and Staffa, Robert and Novotný, Tomáš and Krejčí, Miroslav and Velecký, Lukáš and Skotakova, Monika},
   article_location = {NEW DELHI},
   article_number = {6},
   doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12262-023-03745-9},
   keywords = {Great saphenous vein; Endoscopic vein harvest; Open vein harvest; Femoral-to-popliteal artery bypass; Infrainguinal bypass surgery},
   language = {eng},
   issn = {0972-2068},
   journal = {INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY},
   title = {Long-Term Comparison of Endoscopic Versus Open Saphenous Vein Harvest for Femoral-to-Popliteal Artery Bypass},
   url = {https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12262-023-03745-9},
   volume = {85},
   year = {2023}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 2281499
AU  - Biroš, Ernest - Staffa, Robert - Novotný, Tomáš - Krejčí, Miroslav - Velecký, Lukáš - Skotakova, Monika
PY  - 2023
TI  - Long-Term Comparison of Endoscopic Versus Open Saphenous Vein Harvest for Femoral-to-Popliteal Artery Bypass
JF  - INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY
VL  - 85
IS  - 6
SP  - 1366-1373
EP  - 1366-1373
PB  - SPRINGER INDIA
SN  - 09722068
KW  - Great saphenous vein
KW  - Endoscopic vein harvest
KW  - Open vein harvest
KW  - Femoral-to-popliteal artery bypass
KW  - Infrainguinal bypass surgery
UR  - https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12262-023-03745-9
N2  - Application of endoscopic vein harvest (EVH) in infrainguinal bypass surgery generated mixed results. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes between endoscopic vein harvest and open vein harvest (OVH) in femoral-to-popliteal artery bypass (FPB). Case series analysis that involved all patients undergoing femoral-to-popliteal artery bypass with single-segment great saphenous vein between January 2012 and December 2017. There were 170 femoral-to-popliteal artery bypasses performed in 168 patients who met the inclusion criteria; 25 (14.7%) in EVH group and 145 (85.3%) in OVH group. Chronic limb-threatening ischemia was an indication for surgery in 60% of EVH patients and 79% of OVH patients (15/25; 60% EVH vs 114/145; 79% OVH; p = .08). Mean follow-up was significantly longer for EVH group (65.71 months EVH vs 45.32 months OVH; p = .003). EVH group had a lower wound complication rate (4/25; 16% EVH vs 45/145; 31% OVH; p = .336), especially at the harvest incision site, despite higher rate of obesity amongst EVH patients (15/25; 60% EVH vs 35/145; 24% OVH; p < .001). The reintervention rate was higher in EVH group (10/25; 40% EVH vs 42/145; 29% OVH; p = .38). At 5 years, primary (69.1% EVH vs 67.0% OVH; p = .85), primary assisted (87.6% EVH vs 73.5% OVH; p = .18), and secondary patency rates (87.3% EVH vs 76.7% OVH; p = .25) did not demonstrate significant differences between the groups. Endoscopic vein harvest for femoral-to-popliteal artery bypass decreased the rate and severity of wound complications, but this difference was statistically insignificant. Obese patients are more suitable for endoscopic vein harvest, with relatively lower chances of developing wound infections. Despite the higher rate of reinterventions, endoscopic vein harvest patency rates were in line with those for the open vein harvest group in up to 5 years of follow-up.
ER  -

BIROŠ, Ernest, Robert STAFFA, Tomáš NOVOTNÝ, Miroslav KREJČÍ, Lukáš VELECKÝ a Monika SKOTAKOVA. Long-Term Comparison of Endoscopic Versus Open Saphenous Vein Harvest for Femoral-to-Popliteal Artery Bypass. \textit{INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY}. NEW DELHI: SPRINGER INDIA, 2023, roč.~85, č.~6, s.~1366-1373. ISSN~0972-2068. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12262-023-03745-9.

Podrobný výpis o publikaci