2023
Trust, Social Support and Hope Resources
KRAFFT, Andreas, JohnBosco CHIKA CHUKWUORJI, Rajneesh CHOUBISA, Stella CONTE, Fabien FENOUILLET et. al.Základní údaje
Originální název
Trust, Social Support and Hope Resources
Autoři
KRAFFT, Andreas (756 Švýcarsko), JohnBosco CHIKA CHUKWUORJI (566 Nigérie), Rajneesh CHOUBISA (356 Indie), Stella CONTE (380 Itálie), Fabien FENOUILLET (250 Francie), Valle FLORES-LUCAS (724 Španělsko), Tharina GUSE (710 Jižní Afrika), Elżbieta KASPRZAK (616 Polsko), Charles MARTIN-KRUMM (250 Francie), Helena Agueda MARUJO (620 Portugalsko), Chitra S. NAIR (356 Indie), Dorit REDLICH-AMIRAV (376 Izrael), Mark SINCLAIR (36 Austrálie), Alena SLEZÁČKOVÁ (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí), Patryk STECZ (616 Polsko), Olga VARSOS (36 Austrálie) a Eduardo WILLS HERRERA (170 Kolumbie)
Vydání
Cham, Hope across cultures: Lessons from the International Hope Barometer, od s. 203-257, 55 s. Cross-Cultural Advancements in Positive Psychology, Vol. 14, 2023
Nakladatel
Springer
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Kapitola resp. kapitoly v odborné knize
Obor
50101 Psychology
Stát vydavatele
Švýcarsko
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Forma vydání
tištěná verze "print"
Odkazy
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14110/23:00130877
Organizační jednotka
Lékařská fakulta
ISBN
978-3-031-24411-7
Klíčová slova anglicky
Hope; perceived hope; dispositional hope; optimism; trust
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 30. 5. 2023 14:07, doc. PhDr. Alena Slezáčková, Ph.D.
Anotace
V originále
The chapter is dedicated to the exploration of different sources and activities of hope across countries. In particular, we explore how these serve as expressions of trust and confidence in the availability of resources, nourishing the belief in the feasibility and supporting the realization of wished-for goods considered to be possible, although not necessarily probable. Following an interdisciplinary approach, we integrated perspectives from the disciplines of Positive Psychology, Risk Management, and the Philosophy of Hope to elucidate the difference between trust and confidence. We further differentiate between perceived hope, on the one hand, and dispositional hope and optimism, on the other, backed in this interdisciplinary approach. Using data from the Hope Barometer in 2018 and 2019 we investigated the role of internal and external sources and activities of hope in two studies. Study 1 comprised 12 countries (N = 10,193) and aimed to analyze several personal and external hope sources with a specific focus on social support, religiosity and the feeling of luck in relation to hope. Study 2 was performed with 8 samples from 7 countries (N = 6245), centering on the assessment of several hope activities and their effects on perceived hope. Our findings highlight the importance of social, religious and other external factors of hope, demonstrate the differential nature of perceived and dispositional hope, and show significant differences between countries regarding the role of trust in individual capabilities, in emotional and instrumental support as well as in religious/spiritual experiences and practices.