Shared Positions on Divisive Beliefs Explain
Interorganizational Collaboration : Evidence from Climate
Change Policy Subsystems in 11 Countries

J 2022

Shared Positions on Divisive Beliefs Explain Interorganizational Collaboration : Evidence from Climate Change Policy Subsystems in 11 Countries

KARIMO, Aasa; Paul M. WAGNER; Anna DELICADO; James GOODMAN; Antti GRONOW et al.

Základní údaje

Originální název

Shared Positions on Divisive Beliefs Explain Interorganizational Collaboration : Evidence from Climate Change Policy Subsystems in 11 Countries

Autoři

KARIMO, Aasa; Paul M. WAGNER; Anna DELICADO; James GOODMAN; Antti GRONOW; Myanna LAHSEN; Tze-Luen LIN; Petr OCELÍK ; Volker SCHNEIDER; Keiichi SATOH; Luisa SCHMIDT; Sun-Jin YUN a Tuomas YLÄ-ANTTILA

Vydání

Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Oxford, Oxford univ. press, 2022, 1053-1858

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

50601 Political science

Stát vydavatele

Velká Británie a Severní Irsko

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

URL

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 4.200

Označené pro přenos do RIV

Ano

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14230/22:00129832

Organizační jednotka

Fakulta sociálních studií

Klíčová slova anglicky

collaboration; advocacy coalition framework; climate policy; belief homophily; polarization

Štítky

rivok

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 20. 7. 2023 11:06, Mgr. Blanka Farkašová

Anotace

V originále

Collaboration between public administration organizations and various stakeholders is often prescribed as a potential solution to the current complex problems of governance, such as climate change. According to the Advocacy Coalition Framework, shared beliefs are one of the most important drivers of collaboration. However, studies investigating the role of beliefs in collaboration show mixed results. Some argue that similarity of general normative and empirical policy beliefs elicits collaboration, while others focus on beliefs concerning policy instruments. Proposing a new divisive beliefs hypothesis, we suggest that agreeing on those beliefs over which there is substantial disagreement in the policy subsystem is what matters for collaboration. Testing our hypotheses using policy network analysis and data on climate policy subsystems in 11 countries (Australia, Brazil, the Czech Republic, Germany, Finland, Ireland, Japan, Korea, Portugal, Sweden, and Taiwan), we find belief similarity to be a stronger predictor of collaboration when the focus is divisive beliefs rather than normative and empirical policy beliefs or beliefs concerning policy instruments. This knowledge can be useful for managing collaborative governance networks because it helps to identify potential competing coalitions and to broker compromises between them.

Návaznosti

MUNI/A/1240/2021, interní kód MU

Název: Perspektivy evropské integrace v kontextu globální politiky IV

Investor: Masarykova univerzita, Perspektivy evropské integrace v kontextu globální politiky IV

Přiložené soubory

Shared_Positions_on_Divisive_Beliefs_Explain_Interorganizational_Collaboration.pdf

Citovat

KARIMO, Aasa; Paul M. WAGNER; Anna DELICADO; James GOODMAN; Antti GRONOW; Myanna LAHSEN; Tze-Luen LIN; Petr OCELÍK; Volker SCHNEIDER; Keiichi SATOH; Luisa SCHMIDT; Sun-Jin YUN a Tuomas YLÄ-ANTTILA. Shared Positions on Divisive Beliefs Explain Interorganizational Collaboration : Evidence from Climate Change Policy Subsystems in 11 Countries. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. Oxford: Oxford univ. press, 2022, roč. 33, č. 3, s. 421-433. ISSN 1053-1858. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muac031.

@article{2289204,
   author = {Karimo, Aasa and Wagner, Paul M. and Delicado, Anna and Goodman, James and Gronow, Antti and Lahsen, Myanna and Lin, TzeandLuen and Ocelík, Petr and Schneider, Volker and Satoh, Keiichi and Schmidt, Luisa and Yun, SunandJin and YläandAnttila, Tuomas},
   article_location = {Oxford},
   article_number = {3},
   doi = {https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muac031},
   keywords = {collaboration; advocacy coalition framework; climate policy; belief homophily; polarization},
   language = {eng},
   issn = {1053-1858},
   journal = {Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory},
   title = {Shared Positions on Divisive Beliefs Explain Interorganizational Collaboration : Evidence from Climate Change Policy Subsystems in 11 Countries},
   url = {https://academic.oup.com/jpart/advance-article/doi/10.1093/jopart/muac031/6648118},
   volume = {33},
   year = {2022}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 2289204
AU  - Karimo, Aasa - Wagner, Paul M. - Delicado, Anna - Goodman, James - Gronow, Antti - Lahsen, Myanna - Lin, Tze-Luen - Ocelík, Petr - Schneider, Volker - Satoh, Keiichi - Schmidt, Luisa - Yun, Sun-Jin - Ylä-Anttila, Tuomas
PY  - 2022
TI  - Shared Positions on Divisive Beliefs Explain Interorganizational Collaboration : Evidence from Climate Change Policy Subsystems in 11 Countries
JF  - Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory
VL  - 33
IS  - 3
SP  - 421-433
EP  - 421-433
PB  - Oxford univ. press
SN  - 10531858
KW  - collaboration
KW  - advocacy coalition framework
KW  - climate policy
KW  - belief homophily
KW  - polarization
UR  - https://academic.oup.com/jpart/advance-article/doi/10.1093/jopart/muac031/6648118
N2  - Collaboration between public administration organizations and various stakeholders is often prescribed as a potential solution to the current complex problems of governance, such as climate change. According to the Advocacy Coalition Framework, shared beliefs are one of the most important drivers of collaboration. However, studies investigating the role of beliefs in collaboration show mixed results. Some argue that similarity of general normative and empirical policy beliefs elicits collaboration, while others focus on beliefs concerning policy instruments. Proposing a new divisive beliefs hypothesis, we suggest that agreeing on those beliefs over which there is substantial disagreement in the policy subsystem is what matters for collaboration. Testing our hypotheses using policy network analysis and data on climate policy subsystems in 11 countries (Australia, Brazil, the Czech Republic, Germany, Finland, Ireland, Japan, Korea, Portugal, Sweden, and Taiwan), we find belief similarity to be a stronger predictor of collaboration when the focus is divisive beliefs rather than normative and empirical policy beliefs or beliefs concerning policy instruments. This knowledge can be useful for managing collaborative governance networks because it helps to identify potential competing coalitions and to broker compromises between them.
ER  -

KARIMO, Aasa; Paul M. WAGNER; Anna DELICADO; James GOODMAN; Antti GRONOW; Myanna LAHSEN; Tze-Luen LIN; Petr OCELÍK; Volker SCHNEIDER; Keiichi SATOH; Luisa SCHMIDT; Sun-Jin YUN a Tuomas YLÄ-ANTTILA. Shared Positions on Divisive Beliefs Explain Interorganizational Collaboration : Evidence from Climate Change Policy Subsystems in 11 Countries. \textit{Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory}. Oxford: Oxford univ. press, 2022, roč.~33, č.~3, s.~421-433. ISSN~1053-1858. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muac031.

Přehled o publikaci