2023
Analytic and Holistic Cognitive Style as a Set of Independent Manifests : Evidence from a Validation Study of Six Measurement Instruments
LACKO, David, Tomáš PROŠEK, Jiří ČENĚK, Michaela HELÍSKOVÁ, Pavel UGWITZ et. al.Základní údaje
Originální název
Analytic and Holistic Cognitive Style as a Set of Independent Manifests : Evidence from a Validation Study of Six Measurement Instruments
Autoři
LACKO, David (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí), Tomáš PROŠEK (203 Česká republika, domácí), Jiří ČENĚK (203 Česká republika, domácí), Michaela HELÍSKOVÁ (203 Česká republika, domácí), Pavel UGWITZ (203 Česká republika, domácí), Vojtěch SVOBODA (203 Česká republika, domácí), Peter POČAJI (703 Slovensko, domácí), Matěj VAIS (203 Česká republika, domácí), Helena HALÍŘOVÁ (203 Česká republika, domácí), Vojtěch JUŘÍK (203 Česká republika, domácí) a Čeněk ŠAŠINKA (203 Česká republika, domácí)
Vydání
PLOS ONE, UNITED STATES, PUBLIC LIBRARY OF SCIENCE, 2023, 1932-6203
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
50101 Psychology
Stát vydavatele
Česká republika
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 3.700 v roce 2022
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14210/23:00130958
Organizační jednotka
Filozofická fakulta
UT WoS
001010596300008
Klíčová slova anglicky
cognitive styles; analytic and holistic cognitive style; global and local processing; reaction times; validity
Štítky
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 3. 4. 2024 14:27, Mgr. et Mgr. Stanislav Hasil
Anotace
V originále
Cognitive styles are commonly studied constructs in cognitive psychology. The theory of field dependence-independence was one of the most important cognitive styles. Yet in the past, its measurement had significant shortcomings in validity and reliability. The theory of analytic and holistic cognitive styles attempted to extend this theory and overcome its shortcomings. Unfortunately, the psychometric properties of its measurement methods were not properly verified. Furthermore, new statistical approaches, such as analysis of reaction times, have been overlooked by current research. The aim of this pre-registered study was to verify the psychometric properties (i.e., factor structure, split-half reliability, test-retest reliability, discriminant validity with intelligence and personality, and divergent, concurrent and predictive validity) of several methods routinely applied in the field. We developed/adapted six methods based on self-report questionnaires, rod-and-frame principles, embedded figures, and hierarchical figures. The analysis was conducted on 392 Czech participants, with two data collection waves. The results indicate that the use of methods based on the rod-and-frame principle may be unreliable, demonstrating no absence of association with intelligence. The use of embedded and hierarchical figures is recommended. The self-report questionnaire used in this study showed an unsatisfactory factor structure and also cannot be recommended without futher validation on independent samples. The findings also did not correspond with the original two-dimensional theory.
Návaznosti
GC19-09265J, projekt VaV |
| ||
MUNI/A/1323/2020, interní kód MU |
|