Další formáty:
BibTeX
LaTeX
RIS
@article{2296533,
author = {Gealfow, John Altair},
article_location = {Paříž},
article_number = {7},
keywords = {separation of powers; principle of certainty; predictability of decisions; inner morality of law; vague provisions; judicial review; constitutional review; overbreadth doctrine; retroactivity; retroactive changes to the case law},
language = {eng},
issn = {2739-6649},
journal = {Sorbonne Law Review (Revue Juridique de la Sorbonne)},
title = {Legitimacy of the judiciary in the interpretation of vague statutory provisions},
url = {https://irjs.pantheonsorbonne.fr/sites/default/files/2023-07/Gealfow_RJS_no-7.pdf},
volume = {neuveden},
year = {2023}
}
TY - JOUR
ID - 2296533
AU - Gealfow, John Altair
PY - 2023
TI - Legitimacy of the judiciary in the interpretation of vague statutory provisions
JF - Sorbonne Law Review (Revue Juridique de la Sorbonne)
VL - neuveden
IS - 7
SP - 29-42
EP - 29-42
PB - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne
SN - 27396649
KW - separation of powers
KW - principle of certainty
KW - predictability of decisions
KW - inner morality of law
KW - vague provisions
KW - judicial review
KW - constitutional review
KW - overbreadth doctrine
KW - retroactivity
KW - retroactive changes to the case law
UR - https://irjs.pantheonsorbonne.fr/sites/default/files/2023-07/Gealfow_RJS_no-7.pdf
N2 - The article presents a philosophical analysis of works of Lon Fuller, John Locke and Charles Louis Monstesquieu and precises the consequences of their thoughts on the judiciary’s option to interpret vague statutory provisions. It further provides comparative analysis of the application of those concepts in case law of United States and the Czech Republic as a representant of the civil law systems. The article uses the methodology of balancing different constitutional values and principles and criticizes the practice of courts not applying the proportionality test while changing the interpretation of statutory provisions.
ER -
GEALFOW, John Altair. Legitimacy of the judiciary in the interpretation of vague statutory provisions. \textit{Sorbonne Law Review (Revue Juridique de la Sorbonne)}. Paříž: Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, 2023, neuveden, č.~7, s.~29-42. ISSN~2739-6649.
|
