D 2023

Overcoming false testimonies with focus on false self-incrimination and false confessions

JAROLÍM, Jiří

Základní údaje

Originální název

Overcoming false testimonies with focus on false self-incrimination and false confessions

Autoři

JAROLÍM, Jiří (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí)

Vydání

1. vyd. Vilnius, Brno, Criminalistics and forensic expertology: science, studies, practice, od s. 130-139, 10 s. 2023

Nakladatel

Forensic Science Centre of Lithuania

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Stať ve sborníku

Obor

50501 Law

Stát vydavatele

Litva

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Forma vydání

tištěná verze "print"

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14220/23:00131812

Organizační jednotka

Právnická fakulta

ISSN

Klíčová slova anglicky

Confession; criminalistics; false statements; interrogation; self-incrimination; tactic

Štítky

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 6. 3. 2024 15:48, Mgr. Petra Georgala

Anotace

V originále

This article discusses overcoming false testimonies with a focus on false self-incrimination and false confessions. After outlining the general conditions of interrogation, the reasons why the factual allegations made by the interrogated person may be false are analysed. Unintentional false statements may occur due to errors in perception, in the storage of information in the subject's memory trace, or deficiencies in the reproduction of information from the memory trace. Overcoming deliberate false self-incriminating statements is divided into two phases in the article. First, the need to correctly identify the type of motivation for making false self-incriminating statements, and second, an individualised tactical approach that has the effect of either reducing or eliminating the motivation to make false self-incriminating statements and/or inducing in the interrogated person a motivation to testify truthfully that overrides the already present motivation to testify falsely. A separate chapter is devoted to involuntary false confessions, which are often the result of a breach of the investigator's responsibilities.