Court-Unpacking: A Preliminary Inquiry

C 2023

Court-Unpacking: A Preliminary Inquiry

KOSAŘ, David a Katarína ŠIPULOVÁ

Základní údaje

Originální název

Court-Unpacking: A Preliminary Inquiry

Autoři

KOSAŘ, David (203 Česká republika, domácí) a Katarína ŠIPULOVÁ (703 Slovensko, domácí)

Vydání

320. vyd. Baden-Baden, Transition 2.0 Re-establishing Constitutional Democracy in EU Member States, od s. 323-360, 38 s. 2023

Nakladatel

Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Kapitola resp. kapitoly v odborné knize

Obor

50501 Law

Stát vydavatele

Německo

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Forma vydání

elektronická verze "online"

Odkazy

Repozitář MU Open access knihy

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14220/23:00131840

Organizační jednotka

Právnická fakulta

ISBN

978-3-7560-0079-1

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.5771/9783748914938

Klíčová slova anglicky

unpacking; court-packing; judicial independence; courts; judges

Štítky

rivok

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 4. 4. 2024 13:31, Mgr. Petra Georgala

Anotace

V originále

The proliferation of court-packing wars across different political regimes has recently stirred up a lot of controversy. As one of the techniques allowing executive actors swiftly to capture the courts, align them with their own political preferences or even weaponise them against their opponents, court-packing is particularly tempting for both democratic and autocratic leaders. The legitimacy of court-packing and potential safeguards against this method have therefore triggered vibrant academic debate. Yet, much less attention has been paid to a vexing question: what to do with packed courts once the political actors who staffed them with loyal or ideologically aligned judges lose power. Can courts be unpacked? If so, how? Is unpacking always legitimate or does it depend on the legitimacy of previous court-packing? Should the content of decision-making, judicial behaviour or the personal independence and integrity of packed judges be considered in a normative assessment of unpacking? And what role does eventual redress for removed judges play in these considerations? Addressing these questions, this chapter analyses the normative underpinnings of unpacking in the broader context of democratic decay and abusive constitutionalism

Návaznosti

101002660, interní kód MU

Název: Informal Judicial Institutions: Invisible Determinants of Democratic Decay (Akronym: INFINITY)

Investor: Evropská unie, Informal Judicial Institutions: Invisible Determinants of Democratic Decay, ERC (Excellent Science)

Přiložené soubory

20240404102021454.pdf

Vyhledat podobné dokumenty

Citovat

KOSAŘ, David a Katarína ŠIPULOVÁ. Court-Unpacking: A Preliminary Inquiry. Online. In Michal Bobek, Adam Bodnar, Armin von Bogdandy, Pál Sonnevend (Eds.). Transition 2.0 Re-establishing Constitutional Democracy in EU Member States. 320. vyd. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, 2023, s. 323-360. ISBN 978-3-7560-0079-1. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.5771/9783748914938.

@inbook{2320597,
   author = {Kosař, David and Šipulová, Katarína},
   address = {Baden-Baden},
   booktitle = {Transition 2.0 Re-establishing Constitutional Democracy in EU Member States},
   doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.5771/9783748914938},
   edition = {320},
   editor = {Michal Bobek, Adam Bodnar, Armin von Bogdandy, Pál Sonnevend (Eds.)},
   keywords = {unpacking; court-packing; judicial independence; courts; judges},
   howpublished = {elektronická verze "online"},
   language = {eng},
   location = {Baden-Baden},
   isbn = {978-3-7560-0079-1},
   pages = {323-360},
   publisher = {Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG},
   title = {Court-Unpacking: A Preliminary Inquiry},
   url = {https://is.muni.cz/publication/2320597/cs},
   year = {2023}
}

TY  - CHAP
ID  - 2320597
AU  - Kosař, David - Šipulová, Katarína
PY  - 2023
TI  - Court-Unpacking: A Preliminary Inquiry
VL  - Neuveden
PB  - Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG
CY  - Baden-Baden
SN  - 9783756000791
KW  - unpacking
KW  - court-packing
KW  - judicial independence
KW  - courts
KW  - judges
UR  - https://is.muni.cz/publication/2320597/cs
N2  - The proliferation of court-packing wars across different political regimes has recently stirred up a lot of controversy. As one of the techniques allowing executive actors swiftly to capture the courts, align them with their own political preferences or even weaponise them against their opponents, court-packing is particularly tempting for both democratic and autocratic leaders. The legitimacy of court-packing and potential safeguards against this method have therefore triggered vibrant academic debate. Yet, much less attention has been paid to a vexing question: what to do with packed courts once the political actors who staffed them with loyal or ideologically aligned judges lose power. Can courts be unpacked? If so, how? Is unpacking always legitimate or does it depend on the legitimacy of previous court-packing? Should the content of decision-making, judicial behaviour or the personal independence and integrity of packed judges be considered in a normative assessment of unpacking? And what role does eventual redress for removed judges play in these considerations? Addressing these questions, this chapter analyses the normative underpinnings of unpacking in the broader context of democratic decay and abusive constitutionalism
ER  -

KOSAŘ, David a Katarína ŠIPULOVÁ. Court-Unpacking: A Preliminary Inquiry. Online. In Michal Bobek, Adam Bodnar, Armin von Bogdandy, Pál Sonnevend (Eds.). \textit{Transition 2.0 Re-establishing Constitutional Democracy in EU Member States}. 320. vyd. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH \&{} Co. KG, 2023, s.~323-360. ISBN~978-3-7560-0079-1. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.5771/9783748914938.

Podrobný výpis o publikaci