J 2024

Intentional Automobility: Mobility Choice Between Socialist and Postsocialist Chrononormativity

SEIDENGLANZ, Daniel, Robert OSMAN a Jiří MALÝ

Základní údaje

Originální název

Intentional Automobility: Mobility Choice Between Socialist and Postsocialist Chrononormativity

Autoři

SEIDENGLANZ, Daniel (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí), Robert OSMAN (203 Česká republika, domácí) a Jiří MALÝ (203 Česká republika, domácí)

Vydání

Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis, 2024, 2469-4452

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

50701 Cultural and economic geography

Stát vydavatele

Velká Británie a Severní Irsko

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 3.900 v roce 2022

Organizační jednotka

Přírodovědecká fakulta

UT WoS

001080344900001

Klíčová slova anglicky

chrononormativity; decision-making; intentional automobility; multiplicity of durations; non-Western experience

Štítky

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 11. 1. 2024 08:08, Mgr. Marie Šípková, DiS.

Anotace

V originále

This article responds to the uncritical use of chronological time and the strict division between past, present, and future when thinking about mobility behavior or mobility decisions. On the basis of this critique, it introduces the concept of intentional automobility, which relies on the Bergsonian–Deleuzian conception of time—duration (la durée). It shows that transport-mode decisions are not only made in the present, separated from the past and the future, but that the past and the future are part of every such decision. Using the example of the metropolitan area of Brno, Czech Republic, a postsocialist space, we show how differently socialist and postsocialist societies can be temporally normalized. At the same time, contemporary postsocialist mobility decisions are still influenced by socialist time norms—chrononormatives. Our main research question is how everyday mobility decisions between the car and public transport are influenced by the temporal norms of the society. To answer this question, we have employed a mixed methods research design that has been divided into a quantitative analysis of mode choice for individual trips and a qualitative analysis of statements about mode choice. Key findings include the relationship between transport-mode preference and a particular chrononormative. We identify four contexts—time, routing, alcohol, and everyday activity planning—in which the chrononormatives associated with the car and public transport are substitutable. It is on this basis that we introduce intentional automobility.

Návaznosti

GA17-16097S, projekt VaV
Název: Prostorová nespravedlnost automobilitních technologií
Investor: Grantová agentura ČR, Prostorová nespravedlnost automobilitních technologií