VARTAZARYAN, Gor a Kateřina OCHODKOVÁ. Czech Presidents In Trouble: How Successful Can The System Be Against Presidential Misbehaviour? Acta Politologica. Praha, 2023, roč. 15, č. 3, s. 68-92. ISSN 1804-1302. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.14712/1803-8220/16_2023.
Další formáty:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Základní údaje
Originální název Czech Presidents In Trouble: How Successful Can The System Be Against Presidential Misbehaviour?
Název česky Čeští prezidenti v nesnázích: Jak úspěšný může být systém proti prezidentským neplechám?
Autoři VARTAZARYAN, Gor (203 Česká republika, garant) a Kateřina OCHODKOVÁ (203 Česká republika, domácí).
Vydání Acta Politologica, Praha, 2023, 1804-1302.
Další údaje
Originální jazyk angličtina
Typ výsledku Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor 50601 Political science
Stát vydavatele Česká republika
Utajení není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
WWW Open access časopisu
Kód RIV RIV/00216224:14220/23:00132079
Organizační jednotka Právnická fakulta
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.14712/1803-8220/16_2023
Klíčová slova česky Prezident České republiky; ústavní žaloba; kompetenční žaloba; článek 66
Klíčová slova anglicky President of the Czech Republic; Constitutional Lawsuit; Competence Lawsuit; Article 66
Štítky rivok
Příznaky Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změnil Změnila: Mgr. Petra Georgala, učo 32967. Změněno: 5. 4. 2024 16:39.
Anotace
Presidents in parliamentary regimes are generally less powerful in their competencies and serve more as moderators of political disputes rather than as the main actors of executive power. Despite this, they can often appear at the edge of constitutionality in the performance of their powers. In Central Europe, it is the President of the Czech Republic who finds the greatest discrepancy between written and politically practised powers. Constitutional actors can bring a constitutional lawsuit, a competence lawsuit, or activate against the president Article 66, transferring the performance of certain duties to the other constitutional actors. Often, however, these instruments are not used. Semi-structured interviews with experts (N = 6) in the field of constitutional law revealed to us that the Czech president has broader powers than the Constitution gives him because many constitutional actors do not file a lawsuit even if they had a significant possibility of winning. Our analysis also showed that there are some cases where the experts disagree among themselves such as on the appointment of the governor of Czech National Bank. At the same time, this work revealed the different approaches of the individual presidents in the situations studied. © 2023 Institute of Political Studies. All rights reserved. Výsledek vznikl GAUK č. 146323
VytisknoutZobrazeno: 10. 7. 2024 08:04