FIŠAR, Miloš, Ben GREINER, Christoph HUBER, Elena KATOK, Ali OZKES a Management Science REPRODUCIBILITY COLLABORATION. Reproducibility in Management Science. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE. UNITED STATES: INFORMS, 2024, roč. 70, č. 3, s. 1343-1356. ISSN 0025-1909. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.03556.
Další formáty:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Základní údaje
Originální název Reproducibility in Management Science
Autoři FIŠAR, Miloš (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí), Ben GREINER, Christoph HUBER (40 Rakousko), Elena KATOK (840 Spojené státy), Ali OZKES a Management Science REPRODUCIBILITY COLLABORATION.
Vydání MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, UNITED STATES, INFORMS, 2024, 0025-1909.
Další údaje
Originální jazyk angličtina
Typ výsledku Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor 50200 5.2 Economics and Business
Stát vydavatele Spojené státy
Utajení není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
WWW Article
Impakt faktor Impact factor: 5.400 v roce 2022
Organizační jednotka Ekonomicko-správní fakulta
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.03556
UT WoS 001132639700001
Klíčová slova anglicky reproducibility; replication; crowd science
Příznaky Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změnil Změnila: Mgr. Pavlína Kurková, učo 368752. Změněno: 27. 3. 2024 14:55.
Anotace
With the help of more than 700 reviewers we assess the reproducibility of nearly 500 articles published in the journal Management Science before and after the introduction of a new Data and Code Disclosure policy in 2019. When considering only articles for which data accessibility and hard- and software requirements were not an obstacle for reviewers, the results of more than 95 % of articles under the new disclosure policy could be fully or largely computationally reproduced. However, for 29 % of articles at least part of the dataset was not accessible to the reviewer. Considering all articles in our sample reduces the share of reproduced articles to 68 %. These figures represent a significant increase compared to the period before the introduction of the disclosure policy, where only 12\% of articles voluntarily provided replication materials, out of which 55 % could be (largely) reproduced. Substantial heterogeneity in reproducibility rates across different fields is mainly driven by differences in dataset accessibility. Other reasons for unsuccessful reproduction attempts include missing code, unresolvable code errors, weak or missing documentation, but also soft- and hardware requirements and code complexity. Our findings highlight the importance of journal code and data disclosure policies, and suggest potential avenues for enhancing their effectiveness.
VytisknoutZobrazeno: 2. 5. 2024 16:00