J 2024

Dexamethasone doses in patients with COVID-19 and hypoxia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

MUNCH, Marie Warrer, Anders GRANHOLM, Jan MALÁSKA, Jan STAŠEK, Pablo O RODRIGUEZ et. al.

Základní údaje

Originální název

Dexamethasone doses in patients with COVID-19 and hypoxia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Autoři

MUNCH, Marie Warrer, Anders GRANHOLM, Jan MALÁSKA (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí), Jan STAŠEK (203 Česká republika, domácí), Pablo O RODRIGUEZ, Tyler PITRE, Rebecca WILSON, Jelena SAVOVIC, Bram ROCHWERG, Adam SVOBODNÍK (203 Česká republika, domácí), Milan KRATOCHVÍL (703 Slovensko, domácí), Manuel TABOADA, Vivekanand JHA, Bharath Kumar Tirupakuzhi VIJAYARAGHAVAN, Sheila Nainan MYATRA, Balasubramanian VENKATESH, Anders PERNER a Morten Hylander MOLLER

Vydání

Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, HOBOKEN, WILEY, 2024, 0001-5172

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

30223 Anaesthesiology

Stát vydavatele

Spojené státy

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 2.100 v roce 2022

Organizační jednotka

Lékařská fakulta

UT WoS

001090806200001

Klíčová slova česky

corticosteroids; COVID-19; dexamethasone; hypoxia; meta-analysis

Klíčová slova anglicky

corticosteroids; COVID-19; dexamethasone; hypoxia; meta-analysis

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 5. 4. 2024 09:08, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová

Anotace

V originále

Background: The optimal dose of dexamethasone for severe/critical COVID-19 is uncertain. We compared higher versus standard doses of dexamethasone in adults with COVID-19 and hypoxia.Methods: We searched PubMed and trial registers until 23 June 2023 for randomised clinical trials comparing higher (>6 mg) versus standard doses (6 mg) of dexamethasone in adults with COVID-19 and hypoxia. The primary outcome was mortality at 1 month. Secondary outcomes were mortality closest to 90 days; days alive without life support; and the occurrence of serious adverse events/reactions (SAEs/SARs) closest to 1 month. We assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane RoB2 tool, risk of random errors using trial sequential analysis, and certainty of evidence using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE).Results: We included eight trials (2478 participants), of which four (1293 participants) had low risk of bias. Higher doses of dexamethasone probably resulted in little to no difference in mortality at 1 month (relative risk [RR] 0.97, 95% CI: 0.79-1.19), mortality closest to Day 90 (RR 1.01, 95% CI: 0.86-1.20), and SAEs/SARs (RR 1.00, 95% CI: 0.97-1.02). Higher doses of dexamethasone probably increased the number of days alive without invasive mechanical ventilation and circulatory support but had no effect on days alive without renal replacement therapy.Conclusions: Based on low to moderate certainty evidence, higher versus standard doses of dexamethasone probably result in little to no difference in mortality, SAEs/SARs, and days alive without renal replacement therapy, but probably increase the number of days alive without invasive mechanical ventilation and circulatory support.

Návaznosti

90249, velká výzkumná infrastruktura
Název: CZECRIN IV