Assessing the risk of bias of quantitative analytical studies:
introducing the vision for critical appraisal within JBI
systematic reviews

J 2023

Assessing the risk of bias of quantitative analytical studies: introducing the vision for critical appraisal within JBI systematic reviews

MUNN, Zachary, Jennifer C STONE, Edoardo AROMATARIS, Miloslav KLUGAR, Kim SEARS et. al.

Základní údaje

Originální název

Assessing the risk of bias of quantitative analytical studies: introducing the vision for critical appraisal within JBI systematic reviews

Autoři

MUNN, Zachary (garant), Jennifer C STONE, Edoardo AROMATARIS, Miloslav KLUGAR (203 Česká republika, domácí), Kim SEARS, Jo LEONARDI-BEE a Timothy Hugh BARKER

Vydání

JBI Evidence Synthesis, PHILADELPHIA, Wolters Kluwer Health, 2023, 2689-8381

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

30230 Other clinical medicine subjects

Stát vydavatele

Spojené státy

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

URL

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 2.700 v roce 2022

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14110/23:00133379

Organizační jednotka

Lékařská fakulta

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-22-00224

UT WoS

000945987900002

Klíčová slova anglicky

critical appraisal; methodological quality; risk of bias; systematic reviews

Štítky

14119612, 14119613, rivok

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 1. 2. 2024 12:23, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová

Anotace

V originále

A key step in the systematic review process is the assessment of the methodological quality (or risk of bias) of the included studies. At JBI, we have developed several tools to assist with this evaluation. As evidence synthesis methods continue to evolve, it has been necessary to revise and reflect on JBI's current approach to critical appraisal and to plan a strategy for the future. In this first paper of a series focusing on risk of bias assessment, we introduce our vision for risk of bias assessment for JBI. In future papers in this series, the methodological approach taken for this revision process will be discussed, along with the revised tools and guidance for using these tools.

Návaznosti

LTC20031, projekt VaV

Název: Towards an International Network for Evidence-based Research in Clinical Health Research in the Czech Republic

Investor: Ministerstvo školství, mládeže a tělovýchovy ČR, Towards an International Network for Evidence-based Research in Clinical Health Research in the Czech Republic, INTER-COST

Citovat

MUNN, Zachary, Jennifer C STONE, Edoardo AROMATARIS, Miloslav KLUGAR, Kim SEARS, Jo LEONARDI-BEE a Timothy Hugh BARKER. Assessing the risk of bias of quantitative analytical studies: introducing the vision for critical appraisal within JBI systematic reviews. JBI Evidence Synthesis. PHILADELPHIA: Wolters Kluwer Health, 2023, roč. 21, č. 3, s. 467-471. ISSN 2689-8381. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-22-00224.

@article{2368619,
   author = {Munn, Zachary and Stone, Jennifer C and Aromataris, Edoardo and Klugar, Miloslav and Sears, Kim and LeonardiandBee, Jo and Barker, Timothy Hugh},
   article_location = {PHILADELPHIA},
   article_number = {3},
   doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-22-00224},
   keywords = {critical appraisal; methodological quality; risk of bias; systematic reviews},
   language = {eng},
   issn = {2689-8381},
   journal = {JBI Evidence Synthesis},
   title = {Assessing the risk of bias of quantitative analytical studies: introducing the vision for critical appraisal within JBI systematic reviews},
   url = {https://journals.lww.com/jbisrir/fulltext/2023/03000/assessing_the_risk_of_bias_of_quantitative.2.aspx},
   volume = {21},
   year = {2023}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 2368619
AU  - Munn, Zachary - Stone, Jennifer C - Aromataris, Edoardo - Klugar, Miloslav - Sears, Kim - Leonardi-Bee, Jo - Barker, Timothy Hugh
PY  - 2023
TI  - Assessing the risk of bias of quantitative analytical studies: introducing the vision for critical appraisal within JBI systematic reviews
JF  - JBI Evidence Synthesis
VL  - 21
IS  - 3
SP  - 467-471
EP  - 467-471
PB  - Wolters Kluwer Health
SN  - 26898381
KW  - critical appraisal
KW  - methodological quality
KW  - risk of bias
KW  - systematic reviews
UR  - https://journals.lww.com/jbisrir/fulltext/2023/03000/assessing_the_risk_of_bias_of_quantitative.2.aspx
N2  - A key step in the systematic review process is the assessment of the methodological quality (or risk of bias) of the included studies. At JBI, we have developed several tools to assist with this evaluation. As evidence synthesis methods continue to evolve, it has been necessary to revise and reflect on JBI's current approach to critical appraisal and to plan a strategy for the future. In this first paper of a series focusing on risk of bias assessment, we introduce our vision for risk of bias assessment for JBI. In future papers in this series, the methodological approach taken for this revision process will be discussed, along with the revised tools and guidance for using these tools.
ER  -

MUNN, Zachary, Jennifer C STONE, Edoardo AROMATARIS, Miloslav KLUGAR, Kim SEARS, Jo LEONARDI-BEE a Timothy Hugh BARKER. Assessing the risk of bias of quantitative analytical studies: introducing the vision for critical appraisal within JBI systematic reviews. \textit{JBI Evidence Synthesis}. PHILADELPHIA: Wolters Kluwer Health, 2023, roč.~21, č.~3, s.~467-471. ISSN~2689-8381. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-22-00224.

Podrobný výpis o publikaci