Environmental Law Preliminary References Submitted by Czech and
Slovak Courts: How Does the Story End?

k 2023

Environmental Law Preliminary References Submitted by Czech and Slovak Courts: How Does the Story End?

VIKARSKÁ, Zuzana

Základní údaje

Originální název

Environmental Law Preliminary References Submitted by Czech and Slovak Courts: How Does the Story End?

Autoři

VIKARSKÁ, Zuzana (703 Slovensko, garant, domácí)

Vydání

ECPR General Conference 2023, The Politics of Law and Courts, Decision-making on the bench, 2023

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Prezentace na konferencích

Obor

50500 5.5 Law

Stát vydavatele

Česká republika

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

program konference

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14220/23:00133857

Organizační jednotka

Právnická fakulta

Klíčová slova anglicky

Preliminary References; Court of Justice of the EU; National Courts; Judicial Dialogue.

Štítky

case-law, CJEU, Environmental law, EU Law, preliminary references

Změněno: 21. 3. 2024 10:55, JUDr. Zuzana Vikarská, MJur, MPhil, Ph.D.

Anotace

V originále

Preliminary ruling mechanism is a well-known institute for EU lawyers. However, while the CJEU and its rulings are well-known, that cannot be said about the follow-up work of national courts. After the CJEU issues its decision, the case returns to the national level and its destiny remains unknown - not only to the EU-wide audience, but often even to lawyers and scholars from the same jurisdiction. Sanja Bogojevic has attempted to change this: she analysed all the "follow-up rulings" in cases submitted to the CJEU by Swedish courts in the area of environmental law. This challenge was later accepted also by Lorenzo Squintani, Dionne Annink, Sjoerd Kalisvaart, and Jon Rakipi, thanks to whom we have had a chance to also learn about the follow-up rulings by British, Dutch, Belgian, and Italian courts after they received an answer from the CJEU on their environment-related questions. Together with my team (of 5 junior scholars) we have been analysing cases submitted to the CJEU by Czech and Slovak courts. We have now gathered all relevant data and read all the references, answers, and follow-up rulings. This presentation will narrow down our research to cases in the area of environmental law and will provide an overview of Czech and Slovak contribution to the European judicial dialogue in this area of law. This way, this presentation (and later article) will continue in the line of articles introduced above.

Návaznosti

GA22-21872S, projekt VaV

Název: Justiční dialog v evropských věcech: příklad ČR a SR

Investor: Grantová agentura ČR, Justiční dialog v evropských případech: příklad ČR a SR

Citovat

VIKARSKÁ, Zuzana. Environmental Law Preliminary References Submitted by Czech and Slovak Courts: How Does the Story End? In ECPR General Conference 2023, The Politics of Law and Courts, Decision-making on the bench. 2023.

@proceedings{2386473,
   author = {Vikarská, Zuzana},
   booktitle = {ECPR General Conference 2023, The Politics of Law and Courts, Decision-making on the bench},
   keywords = {Preliminary References; Court of Justice of the EU; National Courts; Judicial Dialogue.},
   language = {eng},
   title = {Environmental Law Preliminary References Submitted by Czech and Slovak Courts: How Does the Story End?},
   url = {https://ecpr.eu/Events/Event/PanelDetails/13081},
   year = {2023}
}

TY  - CONF
ID  - 2386473
AU  - Vikarská, Zuzana
PY  - 2023
TI  - Environmental Law Preliminary References Submitted by Czech and Slovak Courts: How Does the Story End?
KW  - Preliminary References
KW  - Court of Justice of the EU
KW  - National Courts
KW  - Judicial Dialogue.
UR  - https://ecpr.eu/Events/Event/PanelDetails/13081
N2  - Preliminary ruling mechanism is a well-known institute for EU lawyers. However, while the CJEU and its rulings are well-known, that cannot be said about the follow-up work of national courts. After the CJEU issues its decision, the case returns to the national level and its destiny remains unknown - not only to the EU-wide audience, but often even to lawyers and scholars from the same jurisdiction. Sanja Bogojevic has attempted to change this: she analysed all the "follow-up rulings" in cases submitted to the CJEU by Swedish courts in the area of environmental law. This challenge was later accepted also by Lorenzo Squintani, Dionne Annink, Sjoerd Kalisvaart, and Jon Rakipi, thanks to whom we have had a chance to also learn about the follow-up rulings by British, Dutch, Belgian, and Italian courts after they received an answer from the CJEU on their environment-related questions. Together with my team (of 5 junior scholars) we have been analysing cases submitted to the CJEU by Czech and Slovak courts. We have now gathered all relevant data and read all the references, answers, and follow-up rulings. This presentation will narrow down our research to cases in the area of environmental law and will provide an overview of Czech and Slovak contribution to the European judicial dialogue in this area of law. This way, this presentation (and later article) will continue in the line of articles introduced above.
ER  -

VIKARSKÁ, Zuzana. Environmental Law Preliminary References Submitted by Czech and Slovak Courts: How Does the Story End? In \textit{ECPR General Conference 2023, The Politics of Law and Courts, Decision-making on the bench}. 2023.

Podrobný výpis o publikaci