2024
Biomaterials for direct cardiac repair-A rapid scoping review 2012-2022
SEDLÁKOVÁ, Veronika, Sophia MOURCOS, Justina PUPKAITĖ, Yvonne LUNN, Sarah VISINTINI et. al.Základní údaje
Originální název
Biomaterials for direct cardiac repair-A rapid scoping review 2012-2022
Autoři
SEDLÁKOVÁ, Veronika (203 Česká republika, domácí), Sophia MOURCOS, Justina PUPKAITĖ, Yvonne LUNN, Sarah VISINTINI, Irene GUZMAN-SOTO, Marc RUEL, Erik SUURONEN a Emilio I ALARCON
Vydání
ACTA BIOMATERIALIA, London, ELSEVIER SCI LTD, 2024, 1742-7061
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
30201 Cardiac and Cardiovascular systems
Stát vydavatele
Velká Británie a Severní Irsko
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 9.700 v roce 2022
Organizační jednotka
Lékařská fakulta
UT WoS
001240708500001
Klíčová slova anglicky
Heart disease; Clinical trial; Scoping review; Multi-database searching
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 2. 7. 2024 09:31, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Anotace
V originále
A plethora of biomaterials for heart repair are being tested worldwide for potential clinical application. These therapeutics aim to enhance the quality of life of patients with heart disease using various methods to improve cardiac function. Despite the myriad of therapeutics tested, only a minority of these studied biomaterials have entered clinical trials. This rapid scoping review aims to analyze literature available from 2012 to 2022 with a focus on clinical trials using biomaterials for direct cardiac repair, i.e., where the intended function of the biomaterial is to enhance the repair of the endocardium, myocardium, epicardium or pericardium. This review included neither biomaterials related to stents and valve repair nor biomaterials serving as vehicles for the delivery of drugs. Surprisingly, the literature search revealed that only 8 different biomaterials mentioned in 23 different studies out of 7038 documents (journal articles, conference abstracts or clinical trial entries) have been tested in clinical trials since 2012. All of these, intended to treat various forms of ischaemic heart disease (heart failure, myocardial infarction), were of natural origin and most used direct injections as their delivery method. This review thus reveals notable gaps between groups of biomaterials tested pre-clinically and clinically.