Assessment in geography through geography Olympiads: comparison
of results of the Czech National and International Geography
Olympiads from 2015 to 2022

J 2024

Assessment in geography through geography Olympiads: comparison of results of the Czech National and International Geography Olympiads from 2015 to 2022

SVOBODOVÁ, Hana a Petr TRAHORSCH

Základní údaje

Originální název

Assessment in geography through geography Olympiads: comparison of results of the Czech National and International Geography Olympiads from 2015 to 2022

Autoři

SVOBODOVÁ, Hana a Petr TRAHORSCH

Vydání

International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, England, ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD, 2024, 1038-2046

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

50300 5.3 Education

Stát vydavatele

Velká Británie a Severní Irsko

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 1.800 v roce 2022

Organizační jednotka

Pedagogická fakulta

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2024.2352281

Klíčová slova anglicky

Assessment in geography; geography education; Geography Olympiad

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 2. 6. 2024 18:15, RNDr. Hana Svobodová, Ph.D.

Anotace

V originále

Geographical Olympiads are disciplinary competitions that can be a tool for assessing geographical knowledge and skills in different countries of the world. This article aims to analyse the results of the national and international geography Olympiads and to identify their conditionality and interrelationship. The secondary aim is to find out whether the Czech Geography Olympiad (GO) selects contestants who can succeed in the International Geography Olympiad (iGeo). The fulfilment of these two aims can be an incentive for other national geography competitions to reflect and discuss on their structure in relation to iGeo. To achieve the aims, data from the national and international geography Olympiad from 2015 to 2022 were analysed quantitatively. The results indicate that the iGeo has a higher internal consistency and correlation among its parts than the GO, which tests some knowledge and skills that are not required in the iGeo. The results show that the concept of assessment is somewhat different in the two monitored competitions, which may mean a less than ideal selection of contestants for the international round of the competition.

Citovat

SVOBODOVÁ, Hana a Petr TRAHORSCH. Assessment in geography through geography Olympiads: comparison of results of the Czech National and International Geography Olympiads from 2015 to 2022. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education. England: ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD, 2024, s. 1-17. ISSN 1038-2046. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2024.2352281.

@article{2406798,
   author = {Svobodová, Hana and Trahorsch, Petr},
   article_location = {England},
   doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2024.2352281},
   keywords = {Assessment in geography; geography education; Geography Olympiad},
   language = {eng},
   issn = {1038-2046},
   journal = {International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education},
   title = {Assessment in geography through geography Olympiads: comparison of results of the Czech National and International Geography Olympiads from 2015 to 2022},
   year = {2024}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 2406798
AU  - Svobodová, Hana - Trahorsch, Petr
PY  - 2024
TI  - Assessment in geography through geography Olympiads: comparison of results of the Czech National and International Geography Olympiads from 2015 to 2022
JF  - International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education
SP  - 1-17
EP  - 1-17
PB  - ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
SN  - 10382046
KW  - Assessment in geography
KW  - geography education
KW  - Geography Olympiad
N2  - Geographical Olympiads are disciplinary competitions that can be a tool for assessing geographical knowledge and skills in different countries of the world. This article aims to analyse the results of the national and international geography Olympiads and to identify their conditionality and interrelationship. The secondary aim is to find out whether the Czech Geography Olympiad (GO) selects contestants who can succeed in the International Geography Olympiad (iGeo). The fulfilment of these two aims can be an incentive for other national geography competitions to reflect and discuss on their structure in relation to iGeo. To achieve the aims, data from the national and international geography Olympiad from 2015 to 2022 were analysed quantitatively. The results indicate that the iGeo has a higher internal consistency and correlation among its parts than the GO, which tests some knowledge and skills that are not required in the iGeo. The results show that the concept of assessment is somewhat different in the two monitored competitions, which may mean a less than ideal selection of contestants for the international round of the competition.
ER  -

SVOBODOVÁ, Hana a Petr TRAHORSCH. Assessment in geography through geography Olympiads: comparison of results of the Czech National and International Geography Olympiads from 2015 to 2022. \textit{International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education}. England: ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR \&{} FRANCIS LTD, 2024, s.~1-17. ISSN~1038-2046. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2024.2352281.

Podrobný výpis o publikaci