2024
Comparing Conventional Physician-Led Education with VR Education for Pacemaker Implantation: A Randomized Study
DROZDOVA, Adela, Karin POLOKOVA, Otakar JIRAVSKÝ, Bogna JIRAVSKA GODULA, Jan CHOVANCIK et. al.Základní údaje
Originální název
Comparing Conventional Physician-Led Education with VR Education for Pacemaker Implantation: A Randomized Study
Autoři
DROZDOVA, Adela (203 Česká republika), Karin POLOKOVA (203 Česká republika), Otakar JIRAVSKÝ (203 Česká republika, domácí), Bogna JIRAVSKA GODULA (203 Česká republika), Jan CHOVANCIK (203 Česká republika), Ivan RANIC (203 Česká republika), Filip JIRAVSKÝ (203 Česká republika, domácí), Jan HECKO (203 Česká republika) a Libor SKNOURIL (203 Česká republika)
Vydání
Healthcare, BASEL, MDPI, 2024, 2227-9032
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
30201 Cardiac and Cardiovascular systems
Stát vydavatele
Švýcarsko
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 2.800 v roce 2022
Organizační jednotka
Lékařská fakulta
UT WoS
001232298700001
Klíčová slova anglicky
patient education; virtual reality; pacemaker implantation; medical technology in education; health outcomes; preoperative anxiety
Štítky
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 5. 6. 2024 13:54, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Anotace
V originále
Introduction: Education of patients prior to an invasive procedure is pivotal for good cooperation and knowledge retention. Virtual reality (VR) is a fast-developing technology that helps educate both medical professionals and patients. Objective: To prove non-inferiority of VR education compared to conventional education in patients prior to the implantation of a permanent pacemaker (PPM). Methods: 150 participants scheduled for an elective implantation of a PPM were enrolled in this prospective study and randomized into two groups: the VR group (n = 75) watched a 360 degrees video about the procedure using the VR headset Oculus Meta Quest 2, while the conventional group (n = 75) was educated by a physician. Both groups filled out a questionnaire to assess the quality of education pre- and in-hospital, their knowledge of the procedure, and their subjective satisfaction. Results: There was no significant difference in the quality of education. There was a non-significant trend towards higher educational scores in the VR group. The subgroup with worse scores was older than the groups with higher scores (82 vs. 76 years, p = 0.025). Anxiety was reduced in 92% of participants. Conclusion: VR proved to be non-inferior to conventional education. It helped to reduce anxiety and showed no adverse effects.