J 2024

Comparing Conventional Physician-Led Education with VR Education for Pacemaker Implantation: A Randomized Study

DROZDOVA, Adela, Karin POLOKOVA, Otakar JIRAVSKÝ, Bogna JIRAVSKA GODULA, Jan CHOVANCIK et. al.

Základní údaje

Originální název

Comparing Conventional Physician-Led Education with VR Education for Pacemaker Implantation: A Randomized Study

Autoři

DROZDOVA, Adela (203 Česká republika), Karin POLOKOVA (203 Česká republika), Otakar JIRAVSKÝ (203 Česká republika, domácí), Bogna JIRAVSKA GODULA (203 Česká republika), Jan CHOVANCIK (203 Česká republika), Ivan RANIC (203 Česká republika), Filip JIRAVSKÝ (203 Česká republika, domácí), Jan HECKO (203 Česká republika) a Libor SKNOURIL (203 Česká republika)

Vydání

Healthcare, BASEL, MDPI, 2024, 2227-9032

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

30201 Cardiac and Cardiovascular systems

Stát vydavatele

Švýcarsko

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 2.800 v roce 2022

Organizační jednotka

Lékařská fakulta

UT WoS

001232298700001

Klíčová slova anglicky

patient education; virtual reality; pacemaker implantation; medical technology in education; health outcomes; preoperative anxiety

Štítky

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 5. 6. 2024 13:54, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová

Anotace

V originále

Introduction: Education of patients prior to an invasive procedure is pivotal for good cooperation and knowledge retention. Virtual reality (VR) is a fast-developing technology that helps educate both medical professionals and patients. Objective: To prove non-inferiority of VR education compared to conventional education in patients prior to the implantation of a permanent pacemaker (PPM). Methods: 150 participants scheduled for an elective implantation of a PPM were enrolled in this prospective study and randomized into two groups: the VR group (n = 75) watched a 360 degrees video about the procedure using the VR headset Oculus Meta Quest 2, while the conventional group (n = 75) was educated by a physician. Both groups filled out a questionnaire to assess the quality of education pre- and in-hospital, their knowledge of the procedure, and their subjective satisfaction. Results: There was no significant difference in the quality of education. There was a non-significant trend towards higher educational scores in the VR group. The subgroup with worse scores was older than the groups with higher scores (82 vs. 76 years, p = 0.025). Anxiety was reduced in 92% of participants. Conclusion: VR proved to be non-inferior to conventional education. It helped to reduce anxiety and showed no adverse effects.