J 2024

Autologous Alternative Vein Grafts for Infrainguinal Bypass in the Absence of Single-Segment Great Saphenous Vein: A Single-Center Study

BIROŠ, Ernest, Robert STAFFA, Miroslav KREJČÍ, Tomáš NOVOTNÝ, Monika SKOTAKOVA et. al.

Základní údaje

Originální název

Autologous Alternative Vein Grafts for Infrainguinal Bypass in the Absence of Single-Segment Great Saphenous Vein: A Single-Center Study

Autoři

BIROŠ, Ernest (703 Slovensko, domácí), Robert STAFFA (203 Česká republika, domácí), Miroslav KREJČÍ (203 Česká republika, domácí), Tomáš NOVOTNÝ (203 Česká republika, domácí), Monika SKOTAKOVA (203 Česká republika) a Róbert BOBÁK (703 Slovensko, domácí)

Vydání

Annals of Vascular Surgery, NEW YORK, ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC, 2024, 0890-5096

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

30212 Surgery

Stát vydavatele

Spojené státy

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 1.500 v roce 2022

Organizační jednotka

Lékařská fakulta

UT WoS

001217754800001

Klíčová slova anglicky

Vein Grafts; Infrainguinal Bypass

Štítky

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 24. 6. 2024 12:32, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová

Anotace

V originále

Background: Alternative autologous veins can be used as a conduit when adequate great saphenous vein is unavailable. We analyzed the results of our infrainguinal bypasses after adopting upper extremity veins in our practice. Methods: This is a single-center observational study involving all patients whose infrainguinal bypass involved the use of upper extremity veins between April 2019, when we began using arm veins, and February 2023. Results: During the study period, 49 bypasses were done in 48 patients; mean age 68.1 +/- 9.8; men 32 (66.7%); body mass index 28.0 +/- 4.8; indications for surgery: chronic limb threatening ischemia 41 (83.7%); acute limb ischemia 3 (6.1%); complications of previous prosthetic 3 (6.1%), or autologous 2 (4.1%) bypass grafts. Vein splicing was used in 43 (87.8%) bypasses with 3-segment grafts being the most common (26; 53.1%). There were 24 (49.0%) femorotibial, 11 (22.4%) femoropopliteal, 9 (18.4%) femoropedal, and 5 (10.2%) extension jump bypass procedures. Eighteen (36.7%) operations were redo surgeries. Twenty-one (42.9%) bypasses were formed using only arm veins. The median follow-up was 12.9 months (4.5e24.2). Two bypasses occluded during the first 30 postoperative days (2/49; 4.1%). Overall 30-day, 1-year, and 2-year primary patency rates were 93.7% +/- 3.5%, 84.8% +/- 5.9%, and 80.6% +/- 6.9%, and secondary patency (SP) rates were 95.8% +/- 2.9%, 89.2% +/- 5.3%, and 89.2% +/- 5.3%. One-segment grafts had better patencies than 2-, 3-, and 4-segment grafts (1-year SP 100% +/- 0% vs 87.6% +/- 6.0%). Two-year amputation-free survival was 86.8% +/- 6.5%; 2-year overall survival was 88.2% +/- 6.6%. Conclusions: Integration of arm vein grafts in infrainguinal bypass practice can be done safely with low incidences of perioperative graft failure. One-segment grafts had better patencies than spliced vein grafts. The achieved early patency and amputation-free survival rates strongly encourage their use. In the absence of a single -segment great saphenous vein, upper extremity vein grafts should be the preferred conduit choice.