J 2024

Longer-Term Outcomes of the Yacoub versus Bentall Procedure in a Nationwide Propensity-Matched Comparison

GOFUS, Jan, Jiří JARKOVSKÝ, Anna KLECHOVA, Jaroslav HLUBOCKY, Stepan CERNY et. al.

Základní údaje

Originální název

Longer-Term Outcomes of the Yacoub versus Bentall Procedure in a Nationwide Propensity-Matched Comparison

Autoři

GOFUS, Jan (203 Česká republika), Jiří JARKOVSKÝ (203 Česká republika, domácí), Anna KLECHOVA (203 Česká republika), Jaroslav HLUBOCKY (203 Česká republika), Stepan CERNY (203 Česká republika), Martin URBAN (203 Česká republika), Pavel ZACEK (203 Česká republika) a Jan VOJACEK (203 Česká republika)

Vydání

JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, LONDON, WILEY-HINDAWI, 2024, 0886-0440

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

30201 Cardiac and Cardiovascular systems

Stát vydavatele

Velká Británie a Severní Irsko

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 1.600 v roce 2022

Organizační jednotka

Lékařská fakulta

UT WoS

001259412600001

Klíčová slova anglicky

Yacoub Procedure; Bentall Procedure

Štítky

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 5. 11. 2024 14:56, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová

Anotace

V originále

Background. Aortic root replacement with a composite mechanical valve graft (Bentall procedure) has been a recommended strategy in patients with aortic root aneurysm with or without aortic regurgitation. Aortic root remodeling (Yacoub procedure) has emerged as a valve-sparing alternative although there is only scarce multicenter evidence. The aim of our study was to provide nationwide comparison of these two strategies. Methods. This was a retrospective study of data from national registry of cardiac surgery. Using propensity-score matching, we compared all the patients undergoing the Bentall procedure in the Czech Republic between 2010 and 2021 with patients after the Yacoub procedure from four experienced centers. Results. During the study period, 199 patients underwent Yacoub and 526 had Bentall procedure. Of those, 166 pairs were selected and compared. There was no significant difference in perioperative outcomes and in mortality (p=0.96) over the follow-up of 5.7 vs. 6.4 years. The Bentall procedure was associated with a higher risk of major bleeding or thromboembolism (p<0.001), and the Yacoub procedure led to a higher risk of rehospitalizations for valve failure (p=0.01). Conclusions. In a nationwide propensity-matched study, Bentall and Yacoub procedures yield similar longer-term survival. Yacoub offers better freedom from thromboembolism or bleeding at the cost of higher risk of valve failure.