J 2024

High contextual interference improves retention in motor learning: systematic review and meta-analysis

CZYŻ, Stanisław Henryk, Aleksandra M WOJCIK, Petra SOLARSKÁ a Pawel KIPER

Základní údaje

Originální název

High contextual interference improves retention in motor learning: systematic review and meta-analysis

Autoři

CZYŻ, Stanisław Henryk (616 Polsko, garant, domácí), Aleksandra M WOJCIK (616 Polsko), Petra SOLARSKÁ (203 Česká republika) a Pawel KIPER (616 Polsko)

Vydání

Nature Scientific Reports, London, NATURE RESEARCH, 2024, 2045-2322

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

50100 5.1 Psychology and cognitive sciences

Stát vydavatele

Německo

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 4.600 v roce 2022

Organizační jednotka

Fakulta sportovních studií

UT WoS

001270506400050

Klíčová slova anglicky

none
Změněno: 7. 8. 2024 15:32, doc. Stanisław Henryk Czyż, Ph.D.

Anotace

V originále

The effect of practice schedule on retention and transfer has been studied since the first publication on contextual interference (CI) in 1966. However, strongly advocated by scientists and practitioners, the CI effect also aroused some doubts. Therefore, our objective was to review the existing literature on CI and to determine how it affects retention in motor learning. We found 1255 articles in the following databases: Scopus, EBSCO, Web of Science, PsycINFO, ScienceDirect, supplemented by the Google Scholar search engine. We screened full texts of 294 studies, of which 54 were included in the meta-analysis. In the meta-analyses, two different models were applied, i.e., a three-level mixed model and random-effects model with averaged effect sizes from single studies. According to both analyses, high CI has a medium beneficial effect on the whole population. These effects were statistically significant. We found that the random practice schedule in laboratory settings effectively improved motor skills retention. On the contrary, in the applied setting, the beneficial effect of random practice on the retention was almost negligible. The random schedule was more beneficial for retention in older adults (large effect size) and in adults (medium effect size). In young participants, the pooled effect size was negligible and statically insignificant.

Návaznosti

MUNI/A/1396/2015, interní kód MU
Název: Pilotní ověření izokinetického intervenčního programu u pacientek trpících II. stadiem kyčelní osteoartritidy (Akronym: TEP-IZO)
Investor: Masarykova univerzita, Pilotní ověření izokinetického intervenčního programu u pacientek trpících II. stadiem kyčelní osteoartritidy, DO R. 2020_Kategorie A - Specifický výzkum - Studentské výzkumné projekty