2024
High contextual interference improves retention in motor learning: systematic review and meta-analysis
CZYŻ, Stanisław Henryk, Aleksandra M WOJCIK, Petra SOLARSKÁ a Pawel KIPERZákladní údaje
Originální název
High contextual interference improves retention in motor learning: systematic review and meta-analysis
Autoři
CZYŻ, Stanisław Henryk (616 Polsko, garant, domácí), Aleksandra M WOJCIK (616 Polsko), Petra SOLARSKÁ (203 Česká republika) a Pawel KIPER (616 Polsko)
Vydání
Nature Scientific Reports, London, NATURE RESEARCH, 2024, 2045-2322
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
50100 5.1 Psychology and cognitive sciences
Stát vydavatele
Německo
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 4.600 v roce 2022
Organizační jednotka
Fakulta sportovních studií
UT WoS
001270506400050
Klíčová slova anglicky
none
Změněno: 7. 8. 2024 15:32, doc. Stanisław Henryk Czyż, Ph.D.
Anotace
V originále
The effect of practice schedule on retention and transfer has been studied since the first publication on contextual interference (CI) in 1966. However, strongly advocated by scientists and practitioners, the CI effect also aroused some doubts. Therefore, our objective was to review the existing literature on CI and to determine how it affects retention in motor learning. We found 1255 articles in the following databases: Scopus, EBSCO, Web of Science, PsycINFO, ScienceDirect, supplemented by the Google Scholar search engine. We screened full texts of 294 studies, of which 54 were included in the meta-analysis. In the meta-analyses, two different models were applied, i.e., a three-level mixed model and random-effects model with averaged effect sizes from single studies. According to both analyses, high CI has a medium beneficial effect on the whole population. These effects were statistically significant. We found that the random practice schedule in laboratory settings effectively improved motor skills retention. On the contrary, in the applied setting, the beneficial effect of random practice on the retention was almost negligible. The random schedule was more beneficial for retention in older adults (large effect size) and in adults (medium effect size). In young participants, the pooled effect size was negligible and statically insignificant.
Návaznosti
MUNI/A/1396/2015, interní kód MU |
|