2024
Ventilation efficacy during paediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation (PEDIVENT): simulation-based comparative study
SKŘÍŠOVSKÁ, Tamara, Jana DJAKOW, Petr JABANDŽIEV, Tereza KRAMPLOVÁ, Jozef KLUČKA et. al.Základní údaje
Originální název
Ventilation efficacy during paediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation (PEDIVENT): simulation-based comparative study
Autoři
SKŘÍŠOVSKÁ, Tamara (203 Česká republika, domácí), Jana DJAKOW (203 Česká republika, domácí), Petr JABANDŽIEV (203 Česká republika, domácí), Tereza KRAMPLOVÁ (203 Česká republika, domácí), Jozef KLUČKA (703 Slovensko, domácí), Martina KOSINOVÁ (203 Česká republika, domácí) a Petr ŠTOURAČ (203 Česká republika, domácí)
Vydání
Frontiers in Medicine, LAUSANNE, FRONTIERS MEDIA SA, 2024, 2296-858X
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
30221 Critical care medicine and Emergency medicine
Stát vydavatele
Švýcarsko
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 3.900 v roce 2022
Organizační jednotka
Lékařská fakulta
UT WoS
001305702300001
Klíčová slova anglicky
ventilation efficacy; paediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 8. 10. 2024 13:43, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Anotace
V originále
Introduction: This simulation-based study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ventilation during paediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) provided by healthcare professionals (HCPs) and lay rescuers (LRs). The objective was to assess the number of effective breaths delivered during the initial sequence of CPR. Effective ventilation plays a critical role during paediatric CPR as most cardiac arrests are secondary to hypoxia in origin. The recommendations on initial resuscitation in unresponsive, non-breathing children differ worldwide. The European Resuscitation Council (ERC) guidelines recommend five breaths before starting the chest compressions. Yet, this recommendation was based on the expert consensus historically and has not changed since 2000 because of the lack of evidence. This research addresses the identified knowledge gap, with potential implications for improving resuscitation practices and ultimately enhancing patient outcomes. Methods: HCPs and LRs performed 90 s of CPR involving two mannequins: 5-kg Baby and 20-kg Junior. Both groups (HCPs and LRs) performed the task before and after structured CPR training, and the efficacy of ventilation before and after the training was compared. The HCPs provided bag-mask ventilation; LR performed dispatcher-assisted CPR with mouth-to-mouth ventilation. Results: The number of participants that reached the primary outcome before and after the training in Baby was 26 (65%) vs. 40 (100%) in HCPs and 28 (60.9%) vs. 45 (97.8%) in LRs (improvement in both p < 0.001), respectively. The number of participants that reached the primary outcome before and after the training in the Junior mannequin was 31 (77.5%) vs. 32 (82.1%) in HCPs (p = 0.77) and 32 (82.1%) vs. 37 (94.9%) in LRs (p = 0.005), respectively. Discussion: This simulation-based study is the first to investigate ventilation efficacy during paediatric CPR provided by HCPs and LRs. Ventilation represents an important aspect of good-quality CPR in children. The concept of initiating paediatric CPR with initial breaths, as stated in ERC guidelines 2021, is justifiable. Trained HCPs and LRs providing dispatcher-assisted CPR could deliver effective ventilation to paediatric mannequins. These findings can contribute to future research in this area and address identified knowledge gaps concerning resuscitation guidelines, given the unique practical application of simulation as a research tool.
Návaznosti
| MUNI/A/1551/2023, interní kód MU |
| ||
| MUNI/A/1595/2023, interní kód MU |
|