GOFUS, Jan, Jan VOJACEK, Mikita KARALKO, Pavel ZACEK, Adrian KOLESAR, Tomas TOPORCER, Martin URBAN, Filip GLAC, Stepan CERNY, Pavel HOMOLA, Jaroslav HLUBOCKY, Andrey SLAUTIN, Petr FILA, Daniela ŽÁKOVÁ, Jan ŠTĚRBA, Hiwad RASHID, Arnaud VAN LINDEN a Tomas HOLUBEC. Aortic valve performance after remodelling versus reimplantation in a propensity-matched comparison. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY. CARY: OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC, 2024, roč. 66, č. 2, s. 1-9. ISSN 1010-7940. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezae234.
Další formáty:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Základní údaje
Originální název Aortic valve performance after remodelling versus reimplantation in a propensity-matched comparison
Autoři GOFUS, Jan (203 Česká republika), Jan VOJACEK (203 Česká republika), Mikita KARALKO, Pavel ZACEK (203 Česká republika), Adrian KOLESAR (203 Česká republika), Tomas TOPORCER (203 Česká republika), Martin URBAN (203 Česká republika), Filip GLAC (203 Česká republika), Stepan CERNY (203 Česká republika), Pavel HOMOLA (203 Česká republika), Jaroslav HLUBOCKY (203 Česká republika), Andrey SLAUTIN, Petr FILA (203 Česká republika, domácí), Daniela ŽÁKOVÁ (203 Česká republika, domácí), Jan ŠTĚRBA (203 Česká republika, domácí), Hiwad RASHID, Arnaud VAN LINDEN a Tomas HOLUBEC (203 Česká republika).
Vydání EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, CARY, OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC, 2024, 1010-7940.
Další údaje
Originální jazyk angličtina
Typ výsledku Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor 30201 Cardiac and Cardiovascular systems
Stát vydavatele Spojené státy
Utajení není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
WWW URL
Impakt faktor Impact factor: 3.400 v roce 2022
Organizační jednotka Lékařská fakulta
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezae234
UT WoS 001284515800001
Klíčová slova anglicky Aortic valve repair; Valve-sparing root replacement; Aortic root aneurysm; Aortic regurgitation; Propensity-score matching
Štítky 14110911, rivok
Příznaky Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změnil Změnila: Mgr. Tereza Miškechová, učo 341652. Změněno: 19. 8. 2024 08:28.
Anotace
OBJECTIVES: Both aortic root remodelling and aortic valve (AV) reimplantation have been used for valve-sparing root replacement in patients with aortic root aneurysm with or without aortic regurgitation. There is no clear evidence to support one technique over the another. This study aimed to compare remodelling with basal ring annuloplasty versus reimplantation on a multicentre level with the use of propensity-score matching. METHODS: This was a retrospective international multicentre study of patients undergoing remodelling or reimplantation between 2010 and 2021. Twenty-three preoperative covariates (including root dimensions and valve characteristics) were used for propensity-score matching. Perioperative outcomes were analysed along with longer-term freedom from AV reoperation/reintervention and other major valve-related events. RESULTS: Throughout the study period, 297 patients underwent remodelling and 281 had reimplantation. Using propensity-score matching, 112 pairs were selected and further compared. We did not find a statistically significant difference in perioperative outcomes between the matched groups. Patients after remodelling had significantly higher reintervention risk than after reimplantation over the median follow-up of 6 years (P = 0.016). The remodelling technique (P = 0.02), need for decalcification (P = 0.03) and degree of immediate postoperative AV regurgitation (P < 0.001) were defined as independent risk factors for later AV reintervention. After exclusion of patients with worse than mild AV regurgitation immediately after repair, both techniques functioned comparably (P = 0.089). CONCLUSIONS: AV reimplantation was associated with better valve function in longer-term postoperatively than remodelling. If optimal immediate repair outcome was achieved, both techniques provided comparable AV function.
VytisknoutZobrazeno: 20. 8. 2024 01:19