2024
New models for prediction of postoperative pulmonary complications in lung resection candidates
SVOBODA, Michal; Ivan ČUNDRLE; Marek PLUTINSKÝ; Pavel HOMOLKA; Ladislav MITÁŠ et. al.Basic information
Original name
New models for prediction of postoperative pulmonary complications in lung resection candidates
Authors
SVOBODA, Michal (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution); Ivan ČUNDRLE (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution); Marek PLUTINSKÝ (703 Slovakia, belonging to the institution); Pavel HOMOLKA (203 Czech Republic); Ladislav MITÁŠ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution); Zdeněk CHOVANEC (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution); Lyle J OLSON and Kristián BRAT (703 Slovakia, belonging to the institution)
Edition
ERJ open research, SHEFFIELD, EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY SOC JOURNALS LTD, 2024, 2312-0541
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Article in a journal
Field of Study
30203 Respiratory systems
Country of publisher
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Confidentiality degree
is not subject to a state or trade secret
References:
Impact factor
Impact factor: 4.300 in 2023
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14110/24:00137805
Organization unit
Faculty of Medicine
UT WoS
001340127300002
EID Scopus
2-s2.0-85205262631
Keywords in English
postoperative pulmonary complications; lung resection
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Changed: 28/11/2024 10:19, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Abstract
V originále
Introduction: In recent years, ventilatory efficiency (minute ventilation (V'(E))/carbon dioxide production (V'(CO2) ) slope) and partial pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide (P (ETCO2) ) have emerged as independent predictors of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC). Single parameters may give only partial information regarding periprocedural hazards. Accordingly, our aim was to create prediction models with improved ability to stratify PPC risk in patients scheduled for elective lung resection surgery. Methods: This post hoc analysis was comprised of consecutive lung resection candidates from two prior prospective trials. All individuals completed pulmonary function tests and cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). Logistic regression analyses were used for identification of risk factors for PPC that were entered into the final risk prediction models. Two risk models were developed; the first used rest P (ETCO2) (for patients with no available CPET data), the second used V'(E)/ V'(CO2) slope (for patients with available CPET data). Receiver operating characteristic analysis with the De-Long test and area under the curve (AUC) were used for comparison of models. Results: The dataset from 423 patients was randomly split into the derivation (n=310) and validation (n=113) cohorts. Two final models were developed, both including sex, thoracotomy, "atypical" resection and forced expiratory volume in 1 s/forced vital capacity ratio as risk factors. In addition, the first model also included rest P (ETCO2) , while the second model used V'(E)/V'(CO2) slope from CPET. AUCs of risk scores were 0.795 (95% CI: 0.739-0.851) and 0.793 (95% CI: 0.737-0.849); both p<0.001. No differences in AUCs were found between the derivation and validation cohorts. Conclusions: We created two multicomponental models for PPC risk prediction, both having excellent predictive properties.