2025
Detection of obstetric anal sphincter injuries using machine learning-assisted impedance spectroscopy: a prospective, comparative, multicentre clinical study
BORYCKA, Katarzyna; Marcel MLYNCZAK; Maciej ROSOL; Kacper KORZENIEWSKI; Piotr IWANOWSKI et. al.Základní údaje
Originální název
Detection of obstetric anal sphincter injuries using machine learning-assisted impedance spectroscopy: a prospective, comparative, multicentre clinical study
Autoři
BORYCKA, Katarzyna; Marcel MLYNCZAK; Maciej ROSOL; Kacper KORZENIEWSKI; Piotr IWANOWSKI; Hynek HERMAN; Petr JANKŮ (203 Česká republika, domácí); Malgorzata UCHMAN-MUSIELAK; Erik DOSEDLA; Enrique Gonzalez DIAZ; Iwona SUDOL-SZOPINSKA; Michal MIK; Carlo RATTO a Antonino SPINELLI
Vydání
Scientific Reports, Berlin, NATURE RESEARCH, 2025, 2045-2322
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
30214 Obstetrics and gynaecology
Stát vydavatele
Německo
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 3.900 v roce 2024
Organizační jednotka
Lékařská fakulta
UT WoS
001436277100005
EID Scopus
2-s2.0-86000102572
Klíčová slova anglicky
Obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI); Anal sphincter; Perineal tear; Faecal incontinence; Rapid diagnostics; Clinical study; Impedance spectroscopy; Machine learning
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 2. 4. 2025 13:35, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Anotace
V originále
To evaluate the clinical performance and safety of the ONIRY system for obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASI) detection versus three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound (EAUS). A prospective, comparative, multicentre, international study. Poland, Czechia, Slovakia, and Spain. 152 women between the first moments up to 8 weeks after vaginal delivery. Participants underwent EAUS and were allocated to groups based on OASIS classification: A (no perineal tear), B (1st or 2nd degree tear), or C (3rd or 4th degree, anal sphincters affected). Electric impedance was measured in the anal canal using the ONIRY system. The primary endpoint was the diagnostic outcome of impedance spectroscopy versus EAUS. Adverse events were collected. Part II involved in silico modelling and 10-time 10-fold cross-validation for automated analysis. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. 30 women were allocated to group A, 61 to group B, and 61 to group C. The diagnostic outcome was determined for 147 participants. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the ML-assisted impedance spectroscopy were 87.0 +/- 0.5%, 90.6 +/- 2.0%, and 84.6 +/- 1.9%, respectively, compared with EAUS. After data cleaning, the performance metrics of the proposed final ML model for ONIRY were: 90.0 +/- 0.4%, 90.0 +/- 1.2%, and 90.0 +/- 0.7%, respectively. No adverse device effects or deficiencies were observed. By enabling early identification of sphincter injuries, ML-assisted impedance spectroscopy facilitates timely diagnosis and intervention, potentially reducing long-term complications such as faecal incontinence. Its rapid, bedside application in obstetric settings supports immediate postpartum care, complementing digital rectal examination and optimizing clinical decision-making.