2025
Effects of perceived instructional support and self-regulated learning support on students’ learning behavior in an online learning environment
JUHAŇÁK, Libor; Karla BRÜCKNEROVÁ; Jakub JARINA; Jiří ZOUNEK; Vojtěch JUŘÍK et al.Základní údaje
Originální název
Effects of perceived instructional support and self-regulated learning support on students’ learning behavior in an online learning environment
Vydání
PLoS One, PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE, 2025, 1932-6203
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
50301 Education, general; including training, pedagogy, didactics [and education systems]
Stát vydavatele
Spojené státy
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 2.600 v roce 2024
Označené pro přenos do RIV
Ano
Organizační jednotka
Filozofická fakulta
UT WoS
EID Scopus
Klíčová slova anglicky
Learning Analytics; self-regulated learning; online learning environments; learning behavior; instructional support
Štítky
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 17. 2. 2026 07:07, Mgr. et Mgr. Stanislav Hasil, Ph.D.
Anotace
V originále
Learning Analytics (LA) has advanced significantly in recent years; however, its findings often suffer from limited generalizability and transferability due to reliance on data from a small number of courses. Course design variability is a critical factor influencing students’ learning behavior in online learning environments (OLEs). This study examines how differences in instructional design, specifically in self-regulated learning (SRL) support, predict the intensity and regularity of students’ learning behavior in OLEs. Using qualitative content analysis, we developed the SRL-S coding scheme to systematically assess the extent to which course design supports specific SRL processes. The coding scheme was validated by three independent researchers and applied to 76 courses. Multilevel modeling analysis confirmed substantial variability in student learning behavior across courses. Higher SRL support was associated with more frequent course visits (β = .46, p < .001), greater regularity of visits (β = −.31, p < .001), and increased total time spent in a course (β = .45, p < .001). In contrast, perceived instructional support from the teacher significantly influenced total time spent (β = .12, p = .004) but not the visit frequency (p = .324) or regularity (p = .951). Moreover, SRL support significantly predicted perceived instructional support (β = .17, p = .002). Mediation analysis revealed a small but significant indirect effect of SRL support on total time spent (β = .021, p = .012), while no mediation was found for visit frequency (p = .360) or regularity (p = .836). These findings highlight the pivotal role of structured SRL support in shaping student engagement. Our approach contextualizes LA indicators by accounting for course design differences and suggests that the SRL-S coding scheme could serve as a research-based guideline for enhancing SRL support in online courses.
Návaznosti
| GA21-08218S, projekt VaV |
| ||
| MUNI/A/1673/2024, interní kód MU |
|