Between the model reader and the real audience : Manuscript
evidence of supra-regional chronicles

M 2025

Between the model reader and the real audience : Manuscript evidence of supra-regional chronicles

KALHOUS, David a Robert ANTONÍN

Základní údaje

Originální název

Between the model reader and the real audience : Manuscript evidence of supra-regional chronicles

Autoři

KALHOUS, David a Robert ANTONÍN

Vydání

2025

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Uspořádání konference

Obor

60101 History

Stát vydavatele

Česká republika

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Označené pro přenos do RIV

Ano

Organizační jednotka

Filozofická fakulta

Klíčová slova anglicky

Chronicles; high middle ages; early middle ages; manuscript transmission; historiographical culture; landscape; identities

Štítky

rivok

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam

Změněno: 21. 10. 2025 09:47, Mgr. Ester Gaja Pučálková, Ph.D.

Anotace

V originále

There is always a tension between the authorial intention and the real impact and perception of his or her work. One of the few possibilities in medieval studies to appraise such an impact or a perception presents the analysis of materiality, including codicology, manuscript transmission, and history of the text. Further possibility, that should be stressed in our context, presents the without exaggeration pathbreaking Helmut Reimitz´s analysis of Frankish historiography, which masterfully combined the approaches of auxiliary historical sciences with theoretical concepts related to identities and strategies of identification by Walter Pohl, underlined the importance of rethinking the manuscript evidence as a specific source of information. Thanks to it, it is clear that the scrutiny of manuscripts and individual copies of the chronicles promises to improve our understanding of their regional contexts and their possible impact on historical consciousness and changing strategies of identification of different social groups. This research is still in its beginnings despite several interesting contributions (e.g., W. Pohl). Even more limited, however, is our understanding of the impact regional chroniclers had in different periods and regions, whereas it seems that to surpass our lack of understanding, the comparison could be the most suitable (or even further the only) tool.

Návaznosti

GX25-15764X, projekt VaV

Název: Příhraničí a říše. Příklad mojmírovské Moravy

Investor: Grantová agentura ČR, Příhraničí a říše. Příklad mojmírovské Moravy

Přiložené soubory

Conference_Programm_Model_Reader.jpg

Požádat o autorskou verzi souboru

Citovat

KALHOUS, David a Robert ANTONÍN. Between the model reader and the real audience : Manuscript evidence of supra-regional chronicles. 2025.

@proceedings{2524699,
   author = {Kalhous, David and Antonín, Robert},
   keywords = {Chronicles; high middle ages; early middle ages; manuscript transmission; historiographical culture; landscape; identities},
   language = {eng},
   title = {Between the model reader and the real audience : Manuscript evidence of supra-regional chronicles},
   year = {2025}
}

TY  - CONF
ID  - 2524699
AU  - Kalhous, David - Antonín, Robert
PY  - 2025
TI  - Between the model reader and the real audience : Manuscript evidence of supra-regional chronicles
KW  - Chronicles
KW  - high middle ages
KW  - early middle ages
KW  - manuscript transmission
KW  - historiographical culture
KW  - landscape
KW  - identities
N2  - There is always a tension between the authorial intention and the real impact and perception of his or her work. One of the few possibilities in medieval studies to appraise such an impact or a perception presents the analysis of materiality, including codicology, manuscript transmission, and history of the text. Further possibility, that should be stressed in our context, presents the without exaggeration pathbreaking Helmut Reimitz´s analysis of Frankish historiography, which masterfully combined the approaches of auxiliary historical sciences with theoretical concepts related to identities and strategies of identification by Walter Pohl, underlined the importance of rethinking the manuscript evidence as a specific source of information. Thanks to it, it is clear that the scrutiny of manuscripts and individual copies of the chronicles promises to improve our understanding of their regional contexts and their possible impact on historical consciousness and changing strategies of identification of different social groups. This research is still in its beginnings despite several interesting contributions (e.g., W. Pohl). Even more limited, however, is our understanding of the impact regional chroniclers had in different periods and regions, whereas it seems that to surpass our lack of understanding, the comparison could be the most suitable (or even further the only) tool.
ER  -

KALHOUS, David a Robert ANTONÍN. \textit{Between the model reader and the real audience : Manuscript evidence of supra-regional chronicles}. 2025.

Přehled o publikaci