2026
Governance of AI and by AI : Feedback Loops, Regime Variation and Reflexive Polycentric Control
KLEINER, JanZákladní údaje
Originální název
Governance of AI and by AI : Feedback Loops, Regime Variation and Reflexive Polycentric Control
Autoři
Vydání
Global Policy, WILEY-BLACKWELL, 2026, 1758-5880
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
50601 Political science
Stát vydavatele
Velká Británie a Severní Irsko
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 1.800 v roce 2024
Označené pro přenos do RIV
Ano
Organizační jednotka
Fakulta sociálních studií
UT WoS
EID Scopus
Klíčová slova anglicky
AI governance; cybernetic control; legitimacy; political regimes; reflexive polycentric control
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 16. 9. 2026 19:47, Mgr. Blanka Farkašová
Anotace
V originále
This article develops a conceptual framework that links the governance of and by artificial intelligence (AI) into a single con-tinuum that varies across political regime types. Although existing scholarship typically treats governance of AI—oversight,regulation and ethical alignment—and governance by AI—the embedding of algorithms into decision-making—as separatedomains, this article argues that such a dichotomy obscures their mutual dependence. It introduces the framework of ReflexivePolycentric Control (RPC), which views AI governance as two coupled feedback loops: an outer loop of societal oversight andan inner loop of operational deployment. Drawing on reflexive modernization, cybernetic control theory and polycentric gov-ernance, RPC specifies three design principles—distributed authority, requisite variety and reflexive checkpoints—that enablestability and adaptability. The framework further highlights how regime type conditions loop dynamics. Democracies exhibitresilience but fragmentation, autocracies achieve coherence at the cost of brittleness, and transitional regimes face volatility be-cause of inconsistent feedback. RPC thereby provides a logically coherent, testable baseline for analysing AI governance acrossdiverse political contexts and for guiding future empirical research.