2002
Determination of diagnostic species with statistical fidelity measures
CHYTRÝ, Milan, Lubomír TICHÝ, Jason HOLT a Zoltán BOTTA-DUKÁTZákladní údaje
Originální název
Determination of diagnostic species with statistical fidelity measures
Autoři
CHYTRÝ, Milan (203 Česká republika, garant), Lubomír TICHÝ (203 Česká republika), Jason HOLT (840 Spojené státy) a Zoltán BOTTA-DUKÁT (348 Maďarsko)
Vydání
Journal of Vegetation Science, Uppsala, Opulus Press, 2002, 110-9233
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
10600 1.6 Biological sciences
Stát vydavatele
Švédsko
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14310/02:00005547
Organizační jednotka
Přírodovědecká fakulta
UT WoS
000175252300009
Klíčová slova anglicky
Character species; Differential species; Frequency; Indicator species; Non-parametric statistics; Phytosociological database; Plant community; Vegetation classification
Štítky
Změněno: 19. 8. 2003 09:49, prof. RNDr. Milan Chytrý, Ph.D.
Anotace
V originále
Statistical measures of fidelity, i.e. the concentration of species occurrences in vegetation units, are reviewed and compared. The focus is on measures suitable for categorical data which are based on observed species frequencies within a vegetation unit compared with the frequencies expected under random distribution. Particular attention is paid to Bruelheides u value. It is shown that its original form, based on binomial distribution, is an asymmetric measure of fidelity of a species to a vegetation unit which tends to assign comparatively high fidelity values to rare species. Here, a hypergeometric form of u is introduced which is a symmetric measure of the joint fidelity of species to a vegetation unit and vice versa. It is also shown that another form of the binomial u value may be defined which measures the asymmetric fidelity of a vegetation unit to a species. These u values are compared with phi coefficient, chi-square, G statistic and Fishers exact test. Contrary to the other measures, phi coefficient is independent of the number of relevés in the data set, and like the hypergeometric form of u and the chi-square it is little affected by the relative size of the vegetation unit. It is therefore particularly useful when comparing species fidelity values among differently sized data sets and vegetation units. However, unlike the other measures it does not measure any statistical significance and may produce unreliable results for small vegetation units and small data sets. The above measures, all based on the comparison of observed/expected frequencies, are compared with the categorical form of the Dufrene-Legendre Indicator Value Index, an index strongly underweighting the fidelity of rare species. These fidelity measures are applied to a data set of 15 989 relevés of Czech herbaceous vegetation. In a small subset of this data set which simulates a phytosociological table, we demonstrate that traditional table analysis fails to determine diagnostic species of general validity in different habitats and large areas. On the other hand, we show that fidelity calculations used in conjunction with large data sets can replace expert knowledge in the determination of generally valid diagnostic species. Averaging positive fidelity values for all species within a vegetation unit is a useful approach to measure quality of delimination of the vegetation unit. We propose a new way of ordering species in synoptic species-by-relevé tables, using fidelity calculations.
Návaznosti
GA206/99/1523, projekt VaV |
| ||
MSM 143100010, záměr |
|