DOKULIL, Miloš. Democracy and Human Rights: The Contemporaneous Globality of Human Rights. The Bi-Monthly Journal of the BWW Society. Internet: The BWW Society, 2003, III., No 2, p. 1-17.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name Democracy and Human Rights: The Contemporaneous Globality of Human Rights
Name in Czech Demokracie a lidská práva. Současná globalita lidských práv
Authors DOKULIL, Miloš (203 Czech Republic, guarantor).
Edition The Bi-Monthly Journal of the BWW Society, Internet, The BWW Society, 2003.
Other information
Original language English
Type of outcome Article in a journal
Field of Study 50601 Political science
Country of publisher United States of America
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
Organization unit Faculty of Informatics
Keywords in English human/civic rights; natural/moral rights; 5 levels of interaction; social contract; rights and duties; categories of "human rights"; 4 phases of welfare; cultural tradition; the first six years of human life; globalization; insufficiently articulated responsibility
Tags 4 phases of welfare, 5 levels of interaction, categories of "human rights", cultural tradition, globalization, human/civic rights, insufficiently articulated responsibility, natural/moral rights, rights and duties, social contract
Changed by Changed by: prof. PhDr. Ing. Miloslav Dokulil, DrSc., učo 1013. Changed: 26/6/2009 11:48.
Abstract
The notion of human rights seems either too awkward to be discussed, or -- where such rights are not observed --too remote to be useful. There is a strange necessity to continually redefine the sequence of the priorities taken as "human/civic rights" and their value. Owing to the actual, rather problematic economic, cultural and informational globalization the complex of human rights can become a sensitive point of worldwide integration. If anything is a "right", it should not be very ennobling to have to strive for it. The contribution enumerates some major "human rights" and several hindrances preventing their realization. In the West four historical phases of welfare have prevented the worst social clashes. The Achilles' heel in evaluating "human rights" can surely be found in the insufficiently articulated responsibility for their both local and global fulfillment.
Abstract (in Czech)
Termín "lidská práva" může být nejednou problematický. Stává se nejednou citlivým pro případný proces světové integrace. V příspěvku jsou vytčena významnější "lidská práva" i překážky k jejich uplatnění. Na Západě čtyři fáze tzv. "welfare" zabránily nejhorším sociálním střetům. Achilleovou patou "lidských práv" zřejmě je nedostatečně artikulovaná zodpovědnost za jejich naplnění, lokálně i globálně.
PrintDisplayed: 26/4/2024 14:31