J 2003

Proměny dánské politiky

KOPEČEK, Lubomír

Základní údaje

Originální název

Proměny dánské politiky

Název anglicky

Developments in Danish Politics

Autoři

KOPEČEK, Lubomír (203 Česká republika, garant)

Vydání

Politologický časopis, Brno, Mezinárodní politologický ústavy, 2003, 1211-3247

Další údaje

Jazyk

čeština

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

50601 Political science

Stát vydavatele

Česká republika

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14230/03:00030549

Organizační jednotka

Fakulta sociálních studií

Klíčová slova anglicky

Denmark; elections; party system; parties; politics; cleavages

Příznaky

Recenzováno
Změněno: 13. 6. 2008 13:58, prof. PhDr. Lubomír Kopeček, Ph.D.

Anotace

V originále

Článek analyzuje dánskou politiku v průběhu 20. století (zejména strany a volby).

Anglicky

This article analyses the evolution of party system and parties in Denmark during 20th century. Special attention is concentrated on the phenomena of freezing and unfreezing of party system between 1920s and 1960s. However, unfreezing of the party system, which was demonstrated by election 1973, led to the explosive and massive increasing of number of parties, the system (type) change was temporary. Is it true that format of the limited pluralism was transformed to the extreme pluralism. But the type of the party system came back to the earlier moderate pluralism in 1980s. Similarly as in the other Western European countries, the organisation of Danish political parties has changed: from the mass parties with close linkage to some social class and with joining to interests groups (the best example was the social democratic party and trade unions), to more open formation with the catch-all features. A look of the party system was influenced by the new political issues as well. The special importance had the membership in the European Community, immigration issue, postmaterialistic values, reform of the welfare state (and progressive tax) and revitalisation of the church-state division. However, the traditional right-left axis keeps its significance.