JELÍNKOVÁ, Jana a Mojmír TYRLÍK. Relationship between moral reasoning and perception of responsibility in adolescents. Poznan, Poland: Instytut Psychologii UAM, 2002. Miedzynarodowy Festiwal Psychologow.
Další formáty:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Základní údaje
Originální název Relationship between moral reasoning and perception of responsibility in adolescents
Autoři JELÍNKOVÁ, Jana (203 Česká republika) a Mojmír TYRLÍK (203 Česká republika, garant).
Vydání Poznan, Poland, Miedzynarodowy Festiwal Psychologow, 2002.
Nakladatel Instytut Psychologii UAM
Další údaje
Originální jazyk angličtina
Typ výsledku Audiovizuální tvorba
Obor 50100 5.1 Psychology and cognitive sciences
Stát vydavatele Polsko
Utajení není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Kód RIV RIV/00216224:14210/02:00008716
Organizační jednotka Filozofická fakulta
Klíčová slova anglicky moral reasoning; responsibility; adolescents
Štítky Adolescents, moral reasoning, responsibility
Změnil Změnila: PhDr. Jana Dvořáková, Ph.D., učo 22717. Změněno: 27. 5. 2004 12:30.
Anotace
Our research carried out at adolescents refers to the effect of moral dilemmas reasoning on perceived responsibility. We suppose that there exist different kinds of responsibility according to the way how close to self-system of an individual it is. A sample consisted of 213 participants (108 girls and 105 boys, almost 92% were aged between 15 - 17 years). They should name at least three situations in which they or somebody else did something good/ bad. We have focused solely on statements in which participants described their own behavior.There was also used a moral dilemma concerning the abortion with eight alternative solutions: four of them justified the abortion and four gave reasons against it. The results showed that our participants described their responsible/ irresponsible action towards specific people or they emphasised an internal rule according to which they understood their behavior as good or bad. We also found out that both girls and boys who described themselves as "responsible" to internal rule showed significantly less agreement with preconventional reasoning. In comparison with this, the participants who still mention the object of their responsibility indicated higher agreement with this reasoning. These results support our hypothesis, as well as the fact, that girls and boys describing themselves as "irresponsible" to internal rule showed higher agreement with postconventional reasoning.
Návaznosti
GA406/01/1085, projekt VaVNázev: Pojetí odpovědnosti u adolescentů
Investor: Grantová agentura ČR, Pojetí odpovědnosti u adolescentů
VytisknoutZobrazeno: 28. 5. 2024 17:39