Relationship between moral reasoning and perception of
responsibility in adolescents

A 2002

Relationship between moral reasoning and perception of responsibility in adolescents

JELÍNKOVÁ, Jana a Mojmír TYRLÍK

Základní údaje

Originální název

Relationship between moral reasoning and perception of responsibility in adolescents

Autoři

JELÍNKOVÁ, Jana (203 Česká republika) a Mojmír TYRLÍK (203 Česká republika, garant)

Vydání

Poznan, Poland, Miedzynarodowy Festiwal Psychologow, 2002

Nakladatel

Instytut Psychologii UAM

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Audiovizuální tvorba

Obor

50100 5.1 Psychology and cognitive sciences

Stát vydavatele

Polsko

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14210/02:00008716

Organizační jednotka

Filozofická fakulta

Klíčová slova anglicky

moral reasoning; responsibility; adolescents

Štítky

Adolescents, moral reasoning, responsibility

Změněno: 27. 5. 2004 12:30, PhDr. Jana Dvořáková, Ph.D.

Anotace

V originále

Our research carried out at adolescents refers to the effect of moral dilemmas reasoning on perceived responsibility. We suppose that there exist different kinds of responsibility according to the way how close to self-system of an individual it is. A sample consisted of 213 participants (108 girls and 105 boys, almost 92% were aged between 15 - 17 years). They should name at least three situations in which they or somebody else did something good/ bad. We have focused solely on statements in which participants described their own behavior.There was also used a moral dilemma concerning the abortion with eight alternative solutions: four of them justified the abortion and four gave reasons against it. The results showed that our participants described their responsible/ irresponsible action towards specific people or they emphasised an internal rule according to which they understood their behavior as good or bad. We also found out that both girls and boys who described themselves as "responsible" to internal rule showed significantly less agreement with preconventional reasoning. In comparison with this, the participants who still mention the object of their responsibility indicated higher agreement with this reasoning. These results support our hypothesis, as well as the fact, that girls and boys describing themselves as "irresponsible" to internal rule showed higher agreement with postconventional reasoning.

Návaznosti

GA406/01/1085, projekt VaV

Název: Pojetí odpovědnosti u adolescentů

Investor: Grantová agentura ČR, Pojetí odpovědnosti u adolescentů

Citovat

JELÍNKOVÁ, Jana a Mojmír TYRLÍK. Relationship between moral reasoning and perception of responsibility in adolescents. Poznan, Poland: Instytut Psychologii UAM, 2002. Miedzynarodowy Festiwal Psychologow.

@misc{555272,
   author = {Jelínková, Jana and Tyrlík, Mojmír},
   address = {Poznan, Poland},
   keywords = {moral reasoning; responsibility; adolescents},
   language = {eng},
   location = {Poznan, Poland},
   note = {Přednáška na konferenci},
   publisher = {Instytut Psychologii UAM},
   title = {Relationship between moral reasoning and perception of responsibility in adolescents},
   year = {2002}
}

TY  - GEN
ID  - 555272
AU  - Jelínková, Jana - Tyrlík, Mojmír
PY  - 2002
TI  - Relationship between moral reasoning and perception of responsibility in adolescents
VL  - Miedzynarodowy Festiwal Psychologow
PB  - Instytut Psychologii UAM
CY  - Poznan, Poland
N1  - Přednáška na konferenci
KW  - moral reasoning
KW  - responsibility
KW  - adolescents
N2  - Our research carried out at adolescents refers to the effect of moral dilemmas reasoning on perceived responsibility. We suppose that there exist different kinds of responsibility according to the way how close to self-system of an individual it is. A sample consisted of 213 participants (108 girls and 105 boys, almost 92% were aged between 15 - 17 years). They should name at least three situations in which they or somebody else did something good/ bad. We have focused solely on statements in which participants described their own behavior.There was also used a moral dilemma concerning the abortion with eight alternative solutions: four of them justified the abortion and four gave reasons against it. The results showed that our participants described their responsible/ irresponsible action towards specific people or they emphasised an internal rule according to which they understood their behavior as good or bad. We also found out that both girls and boys who described themselves as "responsible" to internal rule showed significantly less agreement with preconventional reasoning. In comparison with this, the participants who still mention the object of their responsibility indicated higher agreement with this reasoning. These results support our hypothesis, as well as the fact, that girls and boys describing themselves as "irresponsible" to internal rule showed higher agreement with postconventional reasoning.
ER  -

JELÍNKOVÁ, Jana a Mojmír TYRLÍK. \textit{Relationship between moral reasoning and perception of responsibility in adolescents}. Poznan, Poland: Instytut Psychologii UAM, 2002. Miedzynarodowy Festiwal Psychologow.

Podrobný výpis o publikaci