D 2004

Negative Phenomena of Transition and the Impact of Privatization

BURUIANA, Alina

Základní údaje

Originální název

Negative Phenomena of Transition and the Impact of Privatization

Název anglicky

Negative Phenomena of Transition and the Impact of Privatization

Autoři

BURUIANA, Alina

Vydání

Ekonomika firiem 2004 I. diel, od s. 55-61, 148 s. 2004

Nakladatel

Podnikovohospodarska fakulta v Kosiciach

Další údaje

Typ výsledku

Stať ve sborníku

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Organizační jednotka

Rektorát

ISBN

80-225-1879-4

Klíčová slova anglicky

transition; privatization speed; Czech Republic; Romania; budget constraint; interest groups; corruption; tunnelling; asset-stripping
Změněno: 1. 12. 2004 19:42, Mgr. Alina Buruiana

Anotace

V originále

Transferring ownership from the state to the private sector in Central and Eastern European countries was considered an essential step of transition towards the market economy. But negative phenomena, which accompanied privatization corruption, asset-stripping, oligarchic entrenchment, tunnelling, etc. proved that interest groups in these post-socialist countries strongly influenced and slowed down the process. This paper tries to analyse the impact of privatization and its speed connected with these negative phenomena, and to offer arguments for a positive view on a quick establishment of property rights. The conclusions are based on the cases of the Czech Republic and Romania compared.

Anglicky

Transferring ownership from the state to the private sector in Central and Eastern European countries was considered an essential step of transition towards the market economy. But negative phenomena, which accompanied privatization corruption, asset-stripping, oligarchic entrenchment, tunnelling, etc. proved that interest groups in these post-socialist countries strongly influenced and slowed down the process. This paper tries to analyse the impact of privatization and its speed connected with these negative phenomena, and to offer arguments for a positive view on a quick establishment of property rights. The conclusions are based on the cases of the Czech Republic and Romania compared.