2006
Sociologický výskum antisemitizmu na Slovensku po roku 1989 v kritickej perspektíve
VAŠEČKA, MichalZákladní údaje
Originální název
Sociologický výskum antisemitizmu na Slovensku po roku 1989 v kritickej perspektíve
Název česky
Sociologický výzkum antisemitizmu na Slovensku po roce 1989 v kritické perspektivě
Název anglicky
Sociological research of the antisemitism in Slovakia after 1989 in a critical perspective
Autoři
VAŠEČKA, Michal (703 Slovensko, garant)
Vydání
Sociológia, Bratislava, Slovenská akadémia vied, 2006, 0049-1225
Další údaje
Jazyk
slovenština
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
50000 5. Social Sciences
Stát vydavatele
Slovensko
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 0.186
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14230/06:00017432
Organizační jednotka
Fakulta sociálních studií
UT WoS
000240179300001
Klíčová slova česky
Antisemitizmus; kvalitativní a kvantitatvní výzkum; výzkumné metody; sociální distance; veřejné mínění; de-judaizovaná perspektiva; socio-psychologické faktory; kritická analýza.
Klíčová slova anglicky
Antisemitism; qualitative and quantitative research; research methods; social distance; public opinion; de-judaized perspective; socio-psychological factors; critical analysis.
Štítky
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 30. 6. 2009 17:44, PhDr. Michal Vašečka, Ph.D.
V originále
Article critically analyses approaches that Slovak sociologists have been using in their analysis of antisemitism in Slovakia after 1989. The article describes quantitative methods used by Slovak sociologists and suggests need of a complex approach to research of antisemitism. Author argues that modern antisemitism is de-judaized, while Slovak researchers focus more on a research of prejudices and stereotypes toward Jews. The research of antisemitism in Slovakia is fully dominated by a Bogarduss scale of social distance while different relevant research methods are not used by Slovak experts. Moreover, in the process of interpretations of public opinion surveys experts do not take into account the so-called escaping answers of respondents and attempts to run away from answering sensitive questions. Socio-psychological research, reflecting authoritarian personality, anomy, alienation and ontological insecurity of common people as sources of anti-Semitism, is rather rare in Slovakia. Consequently, quantitative research of antisemitism in Slovakia can be evaluated as insufficient. De-judaized perspective of anti-Semitism and even of Jews themselves in a Sartre s sense is remaining one of the greatest challenges for sociologists researching antisemitism in Slovakia.
Česky
Article critically analyses approaches that Slovak sociologists have been using in their analysis of antisemitism in Slovakia after 1989. The article describes quantitative methods used by Slovak sociologists and suggests need of a complex approach to research of antisemitism. Author argues that modern antisemitism is de-judaized, while Slovak researchers focus more on a research of prejudices and stereotypes toward Jews. The research of antisemitism in Slovakia is fully dominated by a Bogarduss scale of social distance while different relevant research methods are not used by Slovak experts. Moreover, in the process of interpretations of public opinion surveys experts do not take into account the so-called escaping answers of respondents and attempts to run away from answering sensitive questions. Socio-psychological research, reflecting authoritarian personality, anomy, alienation and ontological insecurity of common people as sources of anti-Semitism, is rather rare in Slovakia. Consequently, quantitative research of antisemitism in Slovakia can be evaluated as insufficient. De-judaized perspective of anti-Semitism and even of Jews themselves in a Sartre s sense is remaining one of the greatest challenges for sociologists researching antisemitism in Slovakia.
Anglicky
Article critically analyses approaches that Slovak sociologists have been using in their analysis of antisemitism in Slovakia after 1989. The article describes quantitative methods used by Slovak sociologists and suggests need of a complex approach to research of antisemitism. Author argues that modern antisemitism is de-judaized, while Slovak researchers focus more on a research of prejudices and stereotypes toward Jews. The research of antisemitism in Slovakia is fully dominated by a Bogarduss scale of social distance while different relevant research methods are not used by Slovak experts. Moreover, in the process of interpretations of public opinion surveys experts do not take into account the so-called escaping answers of respondents and attempts to run away from answering sensitive questions. Socio-psychological research, reflecting authoritarian personality, anomy, alienation and ontological insecurity of common people as sources of anti-Semitism, is rather rare in Slovakia. Consequently, quantitative research of antisemitism in Slovakia can be evaluated as insufficient. De-judaized perspective of anti-Semitism and even of Jews themselves in a Sartre s sense is remaining one of the greatest challenges for sociologists researching antisemitism in Slovakia.
Návaznosti
| MSM0021622408, záměr |
|